Is Static Friction Always Present as a Force?

AI Thread Summary
Static friction is not always present as a force; it only arises in response to an applied force, acting in opposition to it. The potential for static friction exists due to the contact surfaces and the normal force, but it only manifests when there is a lateral force attempting to cause motion. If no external force is applied, static friction does not exert a force that would cause acceleration. The static friction force can cancel out lateral forces up to a certain maximum limit. Understanding this distinction is crucial for analyzing motion and forces in physics.
mmegdill
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm a bit confused about the presence of a static friction FORCE.

So here's the question:

The potential for static friction is always present due to the nature of the contact surfaces and the normal force. But is a static friction FORCE always present or does it arise in response to (specifically in opposition to) the application of some force, somewhat like normal force?

The reason I'm wondering is that it seems to me that if static friction is constantly present as a force it would cause some acceleration in some direction. Which direction would it be?

Thanks for the help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"But is a static friction FORCE always present"
no
"or does it arise in response to (specifically in opposition to) the application of some force"
Yes, a lateral force. I.e. it cancels out lateral force, up to some maximum.
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Static friction needed for rolling without slipping
Replies
4
Views
2K
B Why is static friction necessary for pure rolling?
Replies
4
Views
3K
B Are frictional forces action forces or reaction forces?
Replies
14
Views
1K
What determines the direction of static friction forces?
Replies
6
Views
2K
Rolling friction and static friction....
Replies
2
Views
2K
B Rolling of non-deforming sphere on a non-deforming rough surface?
Replies
4
Views
2K
What happens when a car turns?
Replies
16
Views
2K
I Friction in rolling without slipping
Replies
7
Views
4K
Understanding Friction and Tension in Static vs. Dynamic Scenarios
Replies
18
Views
2K
B Rolling Motion Test: Take the Challenge and Justify Your Answers
Replies
37
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top