Is SU(3) always contains SU(2) groups?

  • A
  • Thread starter Ans
  • Start date
  • #1
Ans
20
1
Hi,

I trying to understand. If there is non-trivial SU(3) group, is it always possible to find SU(2) as part of SU(3)?
And same question about SU(2) and U(1).
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
1,283
345
Sure, there are many ##SU(2)## subgroups of ##SU(3)## just like there are many ##O(2)## subgroups of ##O(3)##.
 
  • #3
Ans
20
1
Thanks.

And another question about same.
SU(3) seems as have less number of parameters than SU(3)xSU(2)xU(1).
If there is SU(3) group, is is possible to say it is compatible with SU(3)xSU(2)xU(1) because SU(3) always contains SU(2) subgroups, and SU(2) always contains U(1)?
 
  • #4
1,283
345
The group, ##G_1\times G_2## is the tensor product of two independent groups. ##G_1## is contained in ##G_1\times G_2## by the projection ##\pi : (g1,g2)\rightarrow g1##. The subgroup inclusion discussed in my previous reply is a subgroup of a different sort. (Mathematics is not my strongest subject) It would help to know what you mean by "compatible?"
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71

Related Threads on Is SU(3) always contains SU(2) groups?

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
659
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
0
Views
963
Top