Is the air in a room an ideal gas?

AI Thread Summary
Air at room temperature behaves like an ideal gas because the temperature is significantly higher than its boiling point, minimizing the effects of intermolecular forces. At this temperature, pressure, and volume, the distance between gas molecules reduces the influence of attractions and repulsions. While density is related to volume, it does not directly determine whether air is an ideal gas; rather, the spacing of molecules is more critical. The relationship between density and volume is given by the equation rho = m/V, where density is proportional to volume. Overall, the characteristics of air at room temperature support its classification as an ideal gas.
bse
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Is the air in a room an ideal gas? How do you know this?

How does this compare to the density of air at room temperature?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
this can probably go into the General Physics or Classical Physics forum.

air at room temp is pretty close to an ideal gas because its temp is much higher than its boiling point.
 
Ok sorry,

thanks a lot
 
it is an ideal gas because the weird forces of attraction and repulsion (Such as hydrogen bonding, diploe-dipole stuff) have very little effect at this temperature, pressure and volume. This is true because the molecules in this gas have enough distance in b/w them at this P,V,T.

Density doesn't really directly have anything to do with this. rho = m/V = (n*MM)/V, the only variable here is V, so density is proportional to the volume, but it as i mentioned above it is the distance b/w the molules that matters, and this of course is related to the density, so that's how the density factors in.


Hope that helps
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...

Similar threads

Back
Top