Is the AP1000 reactor ushering in a new era of nuclear power efficiency?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the revival of the American nuclear industry, particularly with the introduction of the AP1000 reactor, a modern pressurized water reactor. Obama has issued loan guarantees for the construction of two new nuclear plants, with the first located at Plant Vogtle in Georgia. Despite past construction halts, the industry is moving forward with advanced Gen 3/3+ light water reactors, including various modular designs. There are ongoing regulatory challenges, particularly concerning seismic requirements from the NRC. The successful implementation of the AP1000 could signal a new era of nuclear power efficiency in the U.S.
ppnl
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Obama has issued loan guarantees to build two new nuke plants. Anyone know what kind of plants they will build? Are we really going to finally restart the American nuclear industry?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Yes, the American Nuclear Industry is being restarted. The reactors that are being licensed are the AP 1000, a pressurized water reactor.

Here is some more information.

http://www.ap1000.westinghousenuclear.com/

However, there is currently an issue between Westinghouse and the NRC (Nuclear Regulatory Commission) regarding the seismic requirements for the containment building.

More about that here.

http://www.powermag.com/nuclear/NRC...tural-Strength-Could-Delay-Projects_2298.html

The USA location for the first of these reactors is Plant Vogtle located in Georgia.

Thanks
Matt
 
ppnl said:
Obama has issued loan guarantees to build two new nuke plants. Anyone know what kind of plants they will build? Are we really going to finally restart the American nuclear industry?
The nuclear industry never stopped, although construction of NPPs did take a hiatus as of ~1980.

Current plans are for modern Gen 3/3+ LWRs. The AP1000, APWR and EPR are designed around ~14 ft 17x17 fuel, which would be compatable with current 17x17 PWRs.

GEH and Toshiba each offer an ABWR, and GEH has an innovative ESBWR, which uses natural circulation in the PV, although feedwater is forced (pumped).

There are various modular designs being offered.

And DOE has an advanced reactor program (Gen IV), with some exotic concepts.
 
Astronuc said:
The nuclear industry never stopped, although construction of NPPs did take a hiatus as of ~1980.

Current plans are for modern Gen 3/3+ LWRs. The AP1000, APWR and EPR are designed around ~14 ft 17x17 fuel, which would be compatable with current 17x17 PWRs.

GEH and Toshiba each offer an ABWR, and GEH has an innovative ESBWR, which uses natural circulation in the PV, although feedwater is forced (pumped).

There are various modular designs being offered.

And DOE has an advanced reactor program (Gen IV), with some exotic concepts.

Don't forget the Hitachi APWR! It's a behemoth 1700 Mwe :-p
 
QuantumPion said:
Don't forget the Hitachi APWR! It's a behemoth 1700 Mwe :-p
I haven't seen it offered in the US. There is no DCA at the NRC at this time.
 
There are 3 AP1000 reactors already under construction in China and the first one is scheduled to go online in 2013, so we will be able to take advantage of the Chinese learning curve. The reactors are actually rated at 1250MWe because of improvements in the turbines and generators.

From what I've read, China is going to build a 1400Mwe prototype soon using the AP1000 and there are plans to build 1700MWe version using things like annular fuel technology.

http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf63.html"
http://web.mit.edu/mitei/research/spotlights/nuclear-efficiency.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top