Is the Calculation of Spring Deformation in an Accelerating Room Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Like Tony Stark
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Accelerating Spring
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the calculation of spring deformation in a non-inertial frame where a room accelerates vertically. Participants analyze the forces acting on two masses connected by a rope, using Newton's equations to derive relationships between tension, gravitational force, and spring deformation. There is confusion regarding the direction of forces, particularly the tension acting on mass 1 and the choice of coordinate axes. Clarifications are requested on variable definitions and the treatment of accelerations, emphasizing the need for clear distinctions between the two masses and their respective forces. The conversation concludes with a consensus on treating the pseudo-gravity in the accelerating frame as a modification of gravitational acceleration.
Like Tony Stark
Messages
182
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
Two bodies of equal mass are connected by an ideal rope and are inside a room which can accelerate vertically. The second body is attached to a spring of constant ##200 \frac{N}{m}##. Find the deformation of the spring when
A) the room moves with constant velocity
B) the room is accelerating upwards with ##2 \frac{m}{s^2}##.
C) the room is accelerating downwards with ##2 \frac{m}{s^2}##.
Relevant Equations
Newton's equations
I've solved all the cases in the non inertial system.

A) For ##m_1## we have
##x) P_{1x} -T=m.a_x##
##y) N_1 -P_{1y}=m.a_y##

For ##m_2## we have
##y) T+F_e -P_2=m.a_y##

As it moves with constant velocity I solve it setting ##a_x=0##. So for ##m_1## ##mgsin(\alpha)=T##, then I replace it in the tension of ##m_2## and find ##\Delta x##

B) For ##m_1##
##x) mgsin(\alpha)-f*.sin(\alpha)-T=0##

For ##m_2##
##y) Fe + T -mg-f*=0##

Where ##f*=2m##

Then, I replaced the tension from ##m_1## in ##m_2## and found the deformation. (As you see, I considered the elastic force pointing upwards in this case)

C) the same for ##B## just changing the sign of ##f*## and the elastic force.Is this right? Because I had some doubts about the sign of the elastic force.
 

Attachments

  • 20191005_114011.jpg
    20191005_114011.jpg
    37.5 KB · Views: 222
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand your equations. Assume that ##T## is the tension on the rope, that ##x## is the horizontal axis, and ##y## is the vertical axis. Why does ##T## act in the ##x## direction on mass 1? Could you post your free body diagrams, please?
 
tnich said:
I don't understand your equations. Assume that ##T## is the tension on the rope, that ##x## is the horizontal axis, and ##y## is the vertical axis. Why does ##T## act in the ##x## direction on mass 1? Could you post your free body diagrams, please?
For ##m_1## I considered inclined axis and for ##m_2## I considered the typical vertical and horizontal axis.
I've attached the F.B.D.

(##P## is weight)
 

Attachments

  • 20191005_131012.jpg
    20191005_131012.jpg
    37.4 KB · Views: 195
Like Tony Stark said:
For ##m_1## I considered inclined axis and for ##m_2## I considered the typical vertical and horizontal axis.
I've attached the F.B.D.

(##P## is weight)
Why inclined? The room accelerates along the vertical in one-dimensional motion.
 
kuruman said:
Why inclined? The room accelerates along the vertical in one-dimensional motion.
Yes, but as I suppose it doesn't move, the acceleration (with respect to the room) is 0, so it doesn't matter which axis I take.
 
Like Tony Stark said:
Yes, but as I suppose it doesn't move, the acceleration (with respect to the room) is 0, so it doesn't matter which axis I take.
But the fictitious force in the non-inertial frame is along the same axis as the real force of gravity. There is no angle involved, the problem is one-dimensional.
 
kuruman said:
But the fictitious force in the non-inertial frame is along the same axis as the real force of gravity. There is no angle involved, the problem is one-dimensional.
I've corrected it in the first post. Is it ok now?
 
Like Tony Stark said:
Homework Statement: Two bodies of equal mass are connected by an ideal rope and are inside a room which can accelerate vertically. The second body is attached to a spring of constant ##200 \frac{N}{m}##. Find the deformation of the spring when
A) the room moves with constant velocity

Homework Equations: Newton's equations

A) For ##m_1## we have
##x) P_{1x} -T=m.a_x##
##y) N_1 -P_{1y}=m.a_y##

For ##m_2## we have
##y) T+F_e -P_2=m.a_y##

As it moves with constant velocity I solve it setting ##a_x=0##. So for ##m_1## ##mg\sin(\alpha)=T##, then I replace it in the tension of ##m_2## and find ##\Delta x##
...
Like Tony Stark said:
For ##m_1## I considered inclined axis and for ##m_2## I considered the typical vertical and horizontal axis.
I've attached the F.B.D. ( ##P## is weight )
20191005_131012-jpg.jpg
You need more clarity in your choice of variable. You need to distinguish those variables used for Body #1 (on the incline) as opposed to those for Body #2 (the body hanging from the rope while being supported from below by the spring).
As both have the same mass, it is fine to use ##m## for the mass.
However, the acceleration of Body #1 is not the necessarily the same as the acceleration of Body #2. Of course I suppose that the Bodies are at rest in the reference frame attached to the room, although that is not stated. Therefore, the accelerations with respect to the room are both zero.
At any rate, it is recommended that you be clearer as regards defining you variables.

As for your solution, you state:
As it moves with constant velocity I solve it setting ##a_x=0##. So for ##m_1## ##mg\sin(\alpha)=T##, then I replace it in the tension of ##m_2## and find ##\Delta x##
What are the "it"s you refer to?

What have you done with ##a_y## ?

Where does ##\Delta x## appear in any of your expressions?
 
SammyS said:
You need more clarity in your choice of variable. You need to distinguish those variables used for Body #1 (on the incline) as opposed to those for Body #2 (the body hanging from the rope while being supported from below by the spring).
As both have the same mass, it is fine to use ##m## for the mass.
However, the acceleration of Body #1 is not the necessarily the same as the acceleration of Body #2. Of course I suppose that the Bodies are at rest in the reference frame attached to the room, although that is not stated. Therefore, the accelerations with respect to the room are both zero.
At any rate, it is recommended that you be clearer as regards defining you variables.

As for your solution, you state:

What are the "it"s you refer to?

What have you done with ##a_y## ?

Where does ##\Delta x## appear in any of your expressions?
Sorry
Using "It" in that sentence I refer to the room
I didn't write ##a_y## since they are stationary with respect to the room, so I wrote 0
##\Delta x## is "inside" the elastic force (##Fe=-k \Delta x##)I didn't write all the steps because I thought that the ones that I'd written were enough to understand my ideas. Excuse me
 
  • #10
As @karuman says, the acceleration is in the same direction as gravity. So in the accelerating frame you can treat it as an increase (if positive) or decrease (if negative) of the acceleration of gravity. That means you can solve the equations once with the pseudo-gravity equal to ##g+a## and then plug in the different values of ##a## for the three cases.
 
  • #11
tnich said:
As @karuman says, the acceleration is in the same direction as gravity. So in the accelerating frame you can treat it as an increase (if positive) or decrease (if negative) of the acceleration of gravity. That means you can solve the equations once with the pseudo-gravity equal to ##g+a## and then plug in the different values of ##a## for the three cases.
Amen to that. BTW, it's ku[/color]ruman. :oldsmile:
 
  • #12
You would think I would know that by now.
 
Back
Top