Is the Cauchy momentum equation the general form of Newton II?

In summary, the Cauchy momentum equation is a more general form of Newton's Second Law, also known as F=ma. It applies to an arbitrary continuum body and is more general than the common form of Newton's Second Law, which only applies to point masses and centers of mass of rigid bodies. However, the Cauchy momentum equation is not commonly referred to as the general form of Newton's Second Law. This is because Newton's Second Law is often defined as F=ma, which implies dealing with point masses rather than infinitesimal volumes. Additionally, a continuum can be considered the "default" system in mechanics, just like in electromagnetism. The Cauchy momentum equations are derived from Newton's Second Law, after also
  • #1
vco
48
15
Is it appropriate to say that within classical physics the general form of Newton II is the Cauchy momentum equation?

This equation applies to an arbitrary continuum body. Therefore it is more general than the common form of Newton II which applies basically to point masses and centers of mass of rigid bodies only. However, I haven't heard anyone referring to the Cauchy momentum equation as the general form of Newton II.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy_momentum_equation
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
No. NII applies to any system, not just point masses. The Cauchy momentum equations result from additional modelling of the forces acting on a continuum.
 
  • #3
Orodruin said:
No. NII applies to any system, not just point masses. The Cauchy momentum equations result from additional modelling of the forces acting on a continuum.
Does it really apply to a continuum as such? Because NII is usually expressed as F = ma, which kind of implies we are dealing with a point mass rather than an infinitesimal volume.

And shouldn't a continuum be considered the "default" system in mechanics, just like in electromagnetism (e.g. Maxwell's equations)?
 
Last edited:
  • #4
vco said:
Does it really apply to a continuum as such?
Yes.

vco said:
Because NII is usually expressed as F = ma, which kind of implies we are dealing with a point mass rather than an infinitesimal volume.
No. First of all there is nothing in NII that implies a point mass. Second, the more appropriate formulation is F = dp/dt. What makes you think total momentum is not a property of an extended system? It is an extensive quantity.

vco said:
And shouldn't a continuum be considered the "default" system in mechanics, just like in electromagnetism (e.g. Maxwell's equations)?
There is no ”default” system. It is all up to modelling after Newton’s laws.
 
  • #5
Orodruin said:
No. First of all there is nothing in NII that implies a point mass. Second, the more appropriate formulation is F = dp/dt. What makes you think total momentum is not a property of an extended system? It is an extensive quantity.
I understand that momentum is a property of all systems regardless of their type.

But why is momentum often defined as the "product of the mass and velocity of an object", ##p=mv##. This implies that we are restricting ourselves either to a rigid body (using the velocity of the center of mass) or a point mass.

The aforementioned definition for momentum does not apply to a deformable continuum as such. The total momentum for a continuum would be something like ##p = \int \rho v \mathrm{d}V##, from which we get ##p=mv## for special cases such as point masses. Right?
 
  • #6
vco said:
But why is momentum often defined as the "product of the mass and velocity of an object", p=mvp=mvp=mv. This implies that we are restricting ourselves either to a rigid body (using the velocity of the center of mass) or a point mass.
No it does not. For the particular case when you restrict yourself to a rigid body, it becomes p=mv.

The Cauchy momentum equations are derived from NII after also applying additional modelling of forces acting on a continuum. NII is more fundamental.

Nothing in NII a priori requires you to define momentum as p=mv, this is a special case based on modelling of a rigid body. In some sense, NII defines what a force is: it is something that causes a change in the momentum of a system over time. It is then up to you to model that system.
 
  • #7
Also note that p=mv is also true for a continuum when v is taken to be the center of mass motion.
 
  • #8
Orodruin said:
Nothing in NII a priori requires you to define momentum as p=mv, this is a special case based on modelling of a rigid body. In some sense, NII defines what a force is: it is something that causes a change in the momentum of a system over time. It is then up to you to model that system.
Thanks.

However, I am struggling to find an online reference where Newtonian momentum is NOT defined as p = mv, i.e. the particular case for rigid bodies. Is this merely because of the appealing simplicity and wide applicability of the rigid-body assumption?

For example Wikipedia states that p = mv, but does not specify that the equation has a limited applicability. EDIT: Actually, the Wikipedia article has a section for continua.
 
Last edited:
  • #9
vco said:
.e. the particular case for rigid bodies.
Again, it is also true for continua where v is the center of mass motion.
 
  • #10
The Cauchy equation is indeed the local momentum-balance equation, and this is indeed nothing else a direct application of Newton's Lex Secunda, which in full glory indeed reads (for a point particle ##\vec{F}=\dot{\vec{p}}##.

The Cauchy equation refers to a material (macroscopically small microscopically large) fluid volume-element. In Euler notation the equation reads
$$\partial_t g_i+\partial_{j} S_{ji}=\vec{f},$$
where ##\vec{g}## is the momentum density, ##S_{ji}=S_{ij}## the momentum-flux densit, and ##\vec{f}## the force density.

The momentum density ##S_{ji}## gives the flux of the momentum component in direction ##i## (momentum per unit time and unit area) through a surface with normal vector in direction ##j##. Part of this flux is due to the material particles moving through the surface and another part is due to the stresses ##-\sigma_{ij}## at the surface of the fluid volume element:
$$S_{ji}=\rho v_i v_j - \sigma_{ij}.$$
For a isotropic ideal fluid, e.g., ##\sigma_{ij}=-p \delta_{ij}##.

From this you can derive usual fluid equation of motion (Euler for ideal, Navier-Stokes for viscous fluids):
$$g_i=\rho v_i \; \Rightarrow \; \partial_t g_i =v_i \partial_t \rho + \rho \partial_t v_i,$$
and
$$\partial_j S_{ji} =v_i \partial_j (\rho v_j) + \rho v_j \partial_j v_i - \partial_{j} \sigma_{ij}$$
Together with the continuity equation for mass (local mass-conservation law)
$$\partial_t \rho + \partial_j (\rho v_j)=0,$$
you get
$$\rho \mathrm{D}_t v_i = \rho [\partial_t v_i +(\vec{v} \cdot \vec{\nabla}) v_i]=\partial_j \sigma_{ji} + f_i.$$
For the ideal fluid you have
$$\partial_j \sigma_{ji}=-\delta_{ji} \partial_j p=-\partial_i p.$$
Then
$$\rho \mathrm{D}_t \vec{v}=-\vec{\nabla} p + \vec{f}.$$
Note that the signs of the stress tensor and pressure are conventions.
 
  • Like
Likes weirdoguy

1. What is the Cauchy momentum equation?

The Cauchy momentum equation is a fundamental equation in fluid mechanics that describes the relationship between the forces acting on a fluid and its resulting motion. It is based on Newton's second law of motion and is also known as the general form of Newton II.

2. How is the Cauchy momentum equation derived?

The Cauchy momentum equation is derived from the Navier-Stokes equations, which are a set of partial differential equations that govern the motion of a fluid. By applying the principles of conservation of mass and momentum, the Navier-Stokes equations can be simplified to the Cauchy momentum equation.

3. What is the difference between the Cauchy momentum equation and Newton's second law?

The Cauchy momentum equation is a more general form of Newton's second law, which only applies to point particles. The Cauchy momentum equation takes into account the continuous distribution of mass and the effects of fluid viscosity, making it applicable to fluids.

4. Can the Cauchy momentum equation be applied to all types of fluids?

Yes, the Cauchy momentum equation is a general equation that can be applied to all types of fluids, including liquids and gases. However, for some fluids, additional terms may need to be included in the equation to account for other factors such as compressibility or non-Newtonian behavior.

5. What are some practical applications of the Cauchy momentum equation?

The Cauchy momentum equation is used in many engineering and scientific fields, including aerodynamics, hydrodynamics, and chemical engineering. It is also used in the design and analysis of various fluid systems, such as pumps, turbines, and pipelines.

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
786
Replies
117
Views
6K
Replies
44
Views
1K
Replies
27
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
2
Replies
48
Views
2K
  • Mechanics
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top