Is the Direct Product of Groups Associative and Have an Identity Element?

joelkato1605
Messages
19
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Prove G X H is a group.
Relevant Equations
N/A
So I that I need to prove the axioms: associativity, existence of the identity element, and existence of the right inverse.

For associativity I know that the binary operations of G and H have to already be associative, and the elements of G X H are made up of these binary operations, so therefore it is associative?

For identity element let G have identity element e, and H have identity element f, can the identity element of G X H have the set (e,f), so that if (x,y) are included in G X H then (e,f) * (x,y) = (x,y) = (x,y) * (e,f)?

For the right inverse I am stuck, I don't know how to find it without knowing what the binary operations actually do.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot (8).png
    Screenshot (8).png
    13.3 KB · Views: 161
  • Screenshot (8).png
    Screenshot (8).png
    13.3 KB · Views: 153
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember that G and H are groups, so you know that they each have an identity element and inverses for their respective operations. That should be enough. You don't need to know anything more about them.
 
joelkato1605 said:
For associativity I know that the binary operations of G and H have to already be associative, and the elements of G X H are made up of these binary operations, so therefore it is associative?

I think you might know what you're trying to say, but the words here are wrong. The elements of GxH are not made up of the binary operations on G and H, they are made from elements of G and H.

I think it is a good exercise to actually write down (ab)c and show how it transforms into a(bc) step by step.
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top