Biology Is the Disease in the Pedigree Diagram Inherited in an X-Linked Dominant Manner?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nokia8650
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diagram Genetics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on interpreting a pedigree diagram to determine if a disease is inherited in an X-linked dominant manner. The initial observation is that only females transmit the disease, and all offspring of affected females are also affected, suggesting dominance. However, the inability of affected males to pass the condition to their female offspring raises questions about this inheritance pattern. Participants suggest considering alternative inheritance models, such as X-linked recessive or autosomal dominant and recessive, to explore the genetic possibilities. A systematic analysis of the progenitors' genotypes and offspring outcomes is recommended to clarify the inheritance pattern.
nokia8650
Messages
216
Reaction score
0
I was struggling with interpreting the following pedigree diagram:

http://img245.imageshack.us/img245/715/photoon20100411at2211.jpg

I can see from the diagram that only females seem to be capable of transmitting the disease - not males - this lead me to believe it is X-linked. In addition, I noted that EVERY offspring of an affected female is also affected; leading me to believe it is dominant. This lead to me thinking the condition was inherited in an x-linked dominant manner. However, this would not explain why affected males (who would in my model have the dominant disorder on their X chromosome) do not pass on the condition to their female offspring.

Any help is greatly appreciated.. thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
nokia8650 said:
However, this would not explain why affected males (who would in my model have the dominant disorder on their X chromosome) do not pass on the condition to their female offspring.

That appears a conclusive objection!
So you have to consider other possibilities.
 
thanks for the reply! I can't really think of anything... would it be possible for you to nudge me in the right direction? Thanks
 
Just go through X-linked recessive, autosomal dominant and recessive, start with the possible original progenitors' constitution (e.g. original mother must be AA if it is recessive whereas...) write down then the possibilities for F1 etc. and see for each whether there is anything that happens that would be impossible with each starting hypothesis. You cannot offhand predict whether the possibilities are unique or more than one hypothesis is consistent, perhaps someone practiced could see it immediately, not me either.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
15K
Back
Top