Is the Earth's Thermal Output Constant Compared to Other Interstellar Cores?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dirtyd33
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Output Thermal
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the thermal and electromagnetic output of the Earth's core and its comparison to other interstellar cores, such as Mercury and the Sun. Participants explore the nature of thermal energy dissipation and the efficiency of radiative transport in different contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether the focus should be on thermal output or electromagnetic output, highlighting the differences between these concepts.
  • One participant asserts that the total thermal output of the Earth, from the core outward, is approximately 44 TeraWatts, primarily dissipated through conduction and convection, with radiation playing a negligible role below the surface.
  • Another participant notes that the geothermal heat flux from the core is about 0.09 W/m2, which is significantly less than the energy absorbed from the Sun, estimated at over 160 W/m2.
  • It is mentioned that the outward energy flows from the Earth's surface include contributions from convection, latent heat of evaporation, and radiation, with specific values provided for each type of flow.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the significance of thermal versus radiative output and the efficiency of energy transport mechanisms. There is no consensus on whether the thermal output is constant or how it compares to other interstellar cores.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the limitations of radiative transport in opaque materials and the relative contributions of various energy flows, but do not resolve the implications of these factors on the overall thermal output.

dirtyd33
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Is the thermal output, or rather electromagnetic output, of the Earth's core relatively constant? and if so, how does it compare to the output of other interstellar cores, say like mercury or the sun?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Which one are you asking? Thermal output or electromagnetic (i.e. radiative) output?

For cores, this is very different. The thermal energy of the core would be dissipated by conduction and convection as well as radiation...The radiative aspect of this transport is actually not efficient since the Earth is opaque.
 
Matterwave said:
The thermal energy of the core would be dissipated by conduction and convection as well as radiation...

My answer to you is yes. I meant the total thermal output of the earth, from the core outward. I want to know if it is fairly constant/ continuous and what might it's capacity be. But now I think of it I'd like to know just the radiative aspect separately, as well.
 
dirtyd33 said:
My answer to you is yes. I meant the total thermal output of the earth, from the core outward. I want to know if it is fairly constant/ continuous and what might it's capacity be. But now I think of it I'd like to know just the radiative aspect separately, as well.

The total rate of thermal energy coming up from below the Earth's surface is about 44 TeraWatts.
  • Pollack, H.N.; S. J. Hurter, and J. R. Johnson (1993), http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/1993/93RG01249.shtml, Rev. Geophys. 30 (3): 267–280

This is a heat flow mainly by conduction and convection; radiation has essentially no role below the surface.

This energy flux has only a negligible contribution to the much larger heat fluxes above the surface, which are dominated by radiation from the Sun.

The geothermal heat flux from the core works out to be a bit under 0.09 W/m2, which is negligible by comparison with the energy absorbed from the Sun, which works out to be a bit over 160 W/m2.

The energy absorbed at the surface then flows up through the atmosphere and eventually out into space. The outward energy flows are about 17 W/m2 by convection, 80 W/m2 by latent heat of evaporation, and about 63 W/m2 by radiation (radiation here being the difference between thermal radiation upwards and thermal backradiation from the atmosphere). The geothermal flux is several orders of magnitude less than the energy flows above the surface.

Cheers -- sylas
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K