Is the electric field inside a circuit non-conservative?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of the electric field within a circuit, specifically whether it is conservative or not. Participants explore concepts related to circuit theory, electric fields, and the role of electromotive force (emf) in energy changes as charge moves through a circuit.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the electric field in a circuit is conservative within the wires, where the line integral of the electric field is zero, but this does not hold true in the presence of emf.
  • Others argue that circuit theory does not directly address electric fields, as it focuses on voltage and energy conservation without requiring knowledge of the electric field's spatial characteristics.
  • A participant mentions that a time-dependent magnetic field implies the electric field cannot be conservative due to Faraday's Law, which states that the curl of the electric field is non-zero in such cases.
  • Some participants question how the electric field can be considered conservative if it does work on charges as they complete a loop in the circuit, raising concerns about the implications of emf on energy changes.
  • There is a discussion about the role of external forces, such as chemical or mechanical forces, in doing work on charge carriers within the source of emf, suggesting that the electric field itself may not be responsible for the work done.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the electric field in a circuit is conservative, with some asserting it is under certain conditions while others highlight the complexities introduced by emf and external forces. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that circuit theory abstracts away from electric fields, focusing instead on energy conservation and voltage changes, which may limit the applicability of traditional definitions of conservative fields.

Nikitin
Messages
734
Reaction score
27
As charge moves around a circuit, their energy increases by each loop.

However, I just heard somebody say the total electric field inside a circuit is conservative.

How is that possible? Is the field conservative or not? Why?

Thanks for all help! :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Wires are conductors, so within them yes- the line integral of the electric field is 0. But within the emf, this is not true, so the field is not conservative there.
 
In circuit theory you don't deal directly with electric fields, so I don't know how this question arises. In circuit theory the length of a wire or the physical size of a lumped element is unknown. The E-field is the spatial gradient of the voltage, so to know it you would have to know the physical size of the circuit element, as well as the voltage change acorss it. So the electric field is simply something that you do not need and cannot determine within the constraints of circuit theory.

However, energy is conserved in circuit theory. The work done on a circuit is always equal to the work done by the circuit plus the energy stored in the circuit.
 
You can answer this very generally: Whenever and wherever there is a time-dependent magnetic field the electric field cannot be a potential field, because then and there according to Faraday's Law one has
\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{E}=-\frac{1}{c} \partial_t \vec{B} \neq 0.
For a field to have a scalar potential, i.e. to have
\vec{E}=-\vec{\nabla} \vec \Phi,
its curl necessarily must vanish, which is not the case when a time-dependent magnetic field is present.
 
So let's say you have a circuit without any magnetic field inside to speak of. Then the E-field inside the circuit is defined as conservative??

However, how do you then explain the emf increasing the energy of every charge going a loop through the circuit?
 
Nikitin said:
However, how do you then explain the emf increasing the energy of every charge going a loop through the circuit?
What needs to be explained about it?
 
isn't the emf-source part of the circuit and its electric field?
 
Yes. Although, as I mentioned earlier the fields are outside the scope of circuit theory.
 
I'm a complete noob (1st year uni) so don't overestimate me: How can a field be conservative if it does work on a particle going one loop around?
 
  • #10
Note that inside the source charge carriers are pushed "uphill" against the electric field, so there must be some other force (chemical, mechanical etc) acting on them. This force does all the work.
 
  • #11
ohhh, so it's not an electrical field which does the work?

Allright, then I get it. thanks for all the help, guys!
 
  • #12
Nikitin said:
I'm a complete noob (1st year uni) so don't overestimate me: How can a field be conservative if it does work on a particle going one loop around?
Think of another conservative force, like gravity. If water goes downhill (e.g. a river) then gravity does work on the water. The water can be used to do work on other things (e.g. a turbine). Then, if you want to continue the process you have to pump the water back up the hill.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K