Is the Estimated Value of Precious Metals on Asteroid Accurate?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aquitaine
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    News Report
AI Thread Summary
The estimated value of precious metals on asteroids, particularly one studied in 1999, is projected to be at least $20 trillion, raising questions about its accuracy and feasibility. Despite the significant potential return on investment, there are concerns about the practicality of mining and transporting these resources back to Earth. The discussion highlights that while the asteroid may contain vast amounts of metals, the costs associated with space travel and the impact on supply and demand could diminish their value. Additionally, the recovery of metals from Earth’s oceans presents its own challenges, further complicating the economic viability of asteroid mining. Overall, while the figures may seem promising, significant hurdles remain before such ventures can be realized.
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Really? There's really that much in proven resources just sitting there on one asteroid? Whoa...
 
Well yeah but the Earth is a bigger rock. :PI'm kind of surprised no one has come up with a solid plan to go there, $20 trillion should be more than enough return to justify investing in space, hence my initial disbelief at the accuracy of that figure.
 
aquitaine said:
Well yeah but the Earth is a bigger rock. :P
Yes, and of course the Earth has much more!

[edit] Misread the quantity in the article...

Here's a link with a chart showing estimated reserves of a bunch of metals. They seem a little low based on what I've seen elsewhere, but it at least is a good order of magnitude and all in one place: http://www.24hgold.com/english/news...ewitt&article=1427726620G10020&redirect=False

It looks like there is more of the precious metals there, though less of the less precious such as aluminum.
[edit2] Note also, the Earth's reserves noted above are the relatively easily recoverable reserves, not the toal amount on earth. The calculation for Eros is the total amount.
I'm kind of surprised no one has come up with a solid plan to go there, $20 trillion should be more than enough return to justify investing in space, hence my initial disbelief at the accuracy of that figure.
The problem is getting the stuff back. Even if there were solid platinum rocks floating around in low Earth orbit, it wouldn't be cost effective to bring them back to earth.
 
Last edited:
Closer to home - there's 10-20 Million tons of gold in the Earth's oceans.
 
There are at least three problems:

(1) Where do you put this asteroid?

(2) Supply and demand - these metals wouldn't be so precious if there were an asteroid's worth of them on Earth.

(3) Space travel is expensive. It cost $170B in 2005 dollars for 380 kg of moon rocks. It will have to become many orders of magnitude cheaper before mining in space is cost-effective.
 

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
2
Replies
96
Views
9K
Replies
34
Views
7K
Back
Top