Is the Euclidean Topology of ℝn First Countable?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hodgey8806
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Euclidean Topology
Hodgey8806
Messages
140
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Let X:=ℝn with the Euclidean Topology. Is X first countable? Find a nested neighborhood basis for X at 5.


Homework Equations


If X is a topological space and p\inX, a collection Bp of neighborhoods of p is called a neighborhood basis for X at p if every neighborhood of p contains some B\inBp.

We say X is first countable if there exists a countable neighborhood basis at each point.


The Attempt at a Solution


I say yes.
Let p\inX, the set of open balls Br(p) for r being rational forms a neighborhood basis at p. (That is, for all neighborhoods U of p, there is a Br(p)\subseteqU)
Since p was arbitrary and this Bp is countable (since rationals are countable), X is first countable.

As well, we can just let the nest interval be defined as: B(1/2)i(5) for i being a natural number. Thus, B(1/2)i+1(5)<B(1/2)i(5).

I am struggling a bit at this level of proof honestly, and I'm trying to stay afloat. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Your proof looks fine. Just a few nitpicking details: first, r needs to be rational AND positive. Second, although it's pretty obvious, you might say a few words about why you can find an r such that B_r(p) \subseteq U.

Your nested neighborhood basis at 5 is fine. Just one minor detail: instead of <, you want \subset.
 


Thank you!

Wouldn't it just be based on the density of the rationals?
Also, thank you for catching my typo :)
 


Thanks again! This site is amazing!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top