Is the Euler Buckling Formula Suitable for Calculating Balsa Wood Beam Loads?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Euler Buckling Formula, represented as F = (E I π²) / l², is not suitable for calculating the maximum load of a cantilevered balsa wood "I" beam under bending conditions. Instead, this formula applies to axial loads, not perpendicular loads as experienced in bending scenarios. For accurate calculations, it is essential to reference the yield stress of balsa wood and utilize appropriate bending formulas, which can be found in resources such as Roark's Formulas for Stress and Strain and Engineers Edge. The user should ensure they are using the correct values for Young's modulus and the moment of inertia (I) in their calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Euler Buckling Formula and its applications
  • Knowledge of bending mechanics for cantilever beams
  • Familiarity with Young's modulus and yield stress concepts
  • Ability to calculate moment of inertia (I) for beam cross-sections
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the appropriate bending formulas for cantilever beams
  • Study Roark's Formulas for Stress and Strain for various loading conditions
  • Examine the yield stress values for balsa wood and their implications in design
  • Explore resources on beam analysis and load distribution techniques
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, students in structural mechanics, and hobbyists working on projects involving balsa wood structures, particularly those focused on load calculations for beams.

Tolale
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi
For a project I am doing i need to know the maximum load an "I" Beam made out of balsa wood can take. Looking through the internet I found the "Euler Buckling Formula"

F = \frac{E I pi^2}{l^2}

When I use this formula I get a load which is too big, and I think this mght not be the formula or I am doing something wrong.

I = 87499.99 mm^4
L = 400 mm

I find loads of different values of E for Balsa wood, so I am not sure if that's what I am doing wrong.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How do you know this load is too big?

Euler's formula has little to do with a beam in bending. So if you are really talking about the bending of beams you need to talk to your teacher.

You should not just pull formula out of a book or website.
 
Ok, if it's not that equation, then which is it.
THe beam is a boom in a crane made out of balsa wood, it's hinged on one side and the other side will support the load.
What I'd want to find out is the maximum load the boom would withstand in bending like that, I thought it was the Euler equation, But using Young's modulus I found for balsa wood, it gives me a ridiculous answer.
Id appreciate any kind of help, thank you
 
Tolale said:
Hi
For a project I am doing i need to know the maximum load an "I" Beam made out of balsa wood can take. Looking through the internet I found the "Euler Buckling Formula"

F = \frac{E I pi^2}{l^2}

When I use this formula I get a load which is too big, and I think this mght not be the formula or I am doing something wrong.

I = 87499.99 mm^4
L = 400 mm

I find loads of different values of E for Balsa wood, so I am not sure if that's what I am doing wrong.

Thanks

IIRC, your equation is relevant for buckling loads- that is, the load is axial along the beam. That's different than loading a cantilevered beam, where the load is perpendicular to the beam axis.

The detailed formulas depend on the geometry of the beam, the way the beam is held in place, and the distribution of the load, but for most applications, you should be able to find a better formula here:

http://structsource.com/analysis/types/beam.htm

Roark's book has a bizillion different cases worked out. The maximum load to failure is described in terms of the yield stress of the material (which is different than Young's modulus), but some useful information is in the bottom half of this page:

http://www.engineersedge.com/strength_of_materials.htm

Does this help?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K