Is the Expectation Value of x Zero for an Even Potential Energy Function?

FourierX
Messages
73
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Its a problem from a foreign book. It sounded simple to me but I am confused now.


If V(x), a potential energy function, is known to be an even function, what can you say about wave function for any stationary state? What shall be the expectation value of x for any stationary state ?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I grabbed a book by Griffith from my library and figured that if V(x) is even, the time independent wave function can be taken to be either even or odd. I know that expectation value of x for a stationary state has to be 0. But can some help me see this with the standpoint of V(x) being even ?


thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
V(x) is even, so it is symmetric around the origin

the solutions to TISE will be either symmetric or anti-symmetric around the origin

note if \psi is a solution, so will e^{i \phi}\psi for any phi, ie the solution is only unique upto an overall phase

so in the anti-symmetric solution, there is no meaning in one side being negtive and teh other positive positive, as it is equivalent to any solution with phase shifted by phi. the only point is that they are out of phase by p.

when you look at the probabilty distribution given by
P(r)dr = \psi \psi*
the overall phase cancels and P(r)dr will be a non-negative symmetric function, thus the expectation position will be zero
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top