Is the following correct about virtual particles

thenewguy1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
On yahoo I asked if "since virtual particles cone to existence out of nothing. Is it possible that anything else ( discovered or not yet discovered in any universe) would be able to do the same, besides other virtual particles "

And I got this answer

Is it correct?

"No. Virtual particles are simply the result of quantum indeterminancy. It is not possible for empty space to have exactly zero energy, so virtual particles continually pop into existence, only to annihilate again a sliver of a second later. If they didn't annihilate, it would violate the conservation of energy."
 
Physics news on Phys.org
True in general, but at a black hole boundary things may be a little different.
 
mathman said:
True in general, but at a black hole boundary things may be a little different.

In what way may it be a little different
 
thenewguy1 said:
In what way may it be a little different


Stated very loosely, a virtual particle pair in the vicinity of a black hole horizon has the potential for one particle to remain trapped, while the other escapes and becomes "real". The black hole thereby radiates energy - hawking radiation.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top