Are Fields Real or Just Ad Hoc in Science?

In summary: So you're defining "real" as "provides insight to you"? That seems like an odd definition, and not one I would use, but by that definition, no, they are not real.
  • #1
Yashbhatt
348
13
Are electric and magnetic fields real or are they just mathematical manipulations? Of course, one could say that we do not care about whether they are real or not, the only thing which matters is that they are useful in describing various things.

But we assign quantities like energy, momentum to fields. So, shouldn't they be real if they have all these properties?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Yashbhatt said:
Are electric and magnetic fields real or are they just mathematical manipulations? Of course, one could say that we do not care about whether they are real or not, the only thing which matters is that they are useful in describing various things.

But we assign quantities like energy, momentum to fields. So, shouldn't they be real if they have all these properties?
Do you have a radio in your car?
 
  • #3
fresh_42 said:
Do you have a radio in your car?
Yes.
 
  • #4
Yashbhatt said:
Yes.
And the radio program is transmitted by electromagnetic fields. Therefore they are as real as the music is played on the radio.
 
  • #5
Yashbhatt said:
Are electric and magnetic fields real or are they just mathematical manipulations?

How would you tell the difference? That is, what exactly does "real" mean to you?
 
  • #6
jtbell said:
How would you tell the difference? That is, what exactly does "real" mean to you?
Well, that would be difficult to define. But the problem I have is the concept of fields somehow seems too ad-hoc. It doesn't provide insight.
 
  • #7
So you're defining "real" as "provides insight to you"? That seems like an odd definition, and not one I would use, but by that definition, no, they are not real.
 
  • #8
This is a purely philosophical question. Choose the answer you like.

Thread closed.
 
  • #9
Yashbhatt said:
Well, that would be difficult to define. But the problem I have is the concept of fields somehow seems too ad-hoc. It doesn't provide insight.
It does, however, allow us to construct powerful and general mathematical frameworks that do an extraordinarily good job of predicting the behavior of extraordinarily complex systems (It may be amazing that your car radio work, but nowhere near as amazing as that the person who designed it could reasonably expect that it would work while the design was still on paper). That's about as good as it gets in science.

"Ad hoc" in the sense that you're using it is inherent in all science. We choose theories and mathematical frameworks because they match the behavior of the universe around us, and that's an ad hoc procedure. When Newton chose to formulate his law of gravitation, why did he put an ##r^2## in the denominator instead of an ##r^3##? What is so special about 2 other than that it happens to work?
 

1. Is the concept of fields ad-hoc?

No, the concept of fields is not considered ad-hoc. It is a fundamental concept in physics that describes the distribution of a physical quantity in space. Fields are used to explain a wide range of phenomena, from the behavior of light and sound to the interaction between particles in quantum mechanics.

2. How are fields different from particles?

Fields and particles are two different ways of understanding and describing physical phenomena. Fields are continuous and exist throughout space, while particles are discrete and localized. Fields can also interact with each other, while particles interact through the influence of fields.

3. What evidence supports the existence of fields?

The existence of fields is supported by a vast amount of experimental evidence. For example, the behavior of electric and magnetic fields can be observed and measured using instruments such as voltmeters and compasses. The effects of gravitational fields can also be observed, such as the orbit of planets around the sun.

4. Are fields considered fundamental or emergent properties?

Fields are considered fundamental properties of the universe. They are not derived from other properties, but rather are necessary for understanding and describing the behavior of matter and energy. However, the specific type of fields and their interactions may emerge from more fundamental laws and principles.

5. Can fields be created or destroyed?

Fields cannot be created or destroyed, but they can be modified or transformed. For example, an electric field can be created by a charged particle, but the field itself already existed in the space around the particle. Similarly, a magnetic field can be destroyed by removing the source of the field, but the field itself does not disappear.

Similar threads

Replies
49
Views
3K
Replies
85
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
767
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
259
  • STEM Educators and Teaching
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
8
Replies
249
Views
9K
Back
Top