Is the K-G Operator of the Kelin-Gordon Equation a Time Ordered Function?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Karlisbad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operators
Karlisbad
Messages
127
Reaction score
0
Let be the Kelin-gordon equation (m=0) with a potential so:

(-\frac{\partial ^{2}}{\partial t^{2}}+V(x) )\Phi=0

my question is if you consider the wave function above as an operator..is the K-G operator of the form:

<0|T(\Phi(x)\Phi(x')|0> T=time ordered

I think that in both cases..we use the same wave function but once is an scalar (or an spinor for electrons) and the other is an escalar...:shy: :shy:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1.I don't know who Kelin was. Maybe you could supply some reference.

2. Your equation, misses a laplacian.

3. You depicted the Feynman Green function, which is a Green function for the operator written with a Laplacian.

All of course, if you mean "Klein-Gordon"

Daniel.
 
I apologize "DSextercioby"...:rolleyes: i missed the keyboard..:redface: yes i was referring Klein-Gordon equation with rest mass m=0 so:

(-\frac{\partial ^{2}}{\partial t^{2}}+\nabla +V(x))\Phi=0


then if you define the Green function by G(x,x')=<0|T(\Phi(x)\Phi(x'))0>

then my question were if the "Phi" wave function defined in both G and K-G equation is the same ,but in one case is an operator and in the other is an scalar with T=time ordered product.

- By the way i looked at the paper by Scwinger ..taking the Dirac equation with Electromagnetism:

(i\gamma_{\mu}\partial _{\mu}-eA_{\mu}+m)\Psi =0

he got the Green function (i don't know how he did it.. ), he got the functional equation:

<br /> \partial _{\mu}-eA_{\mu}+m+\frac{\delta}{\delta J_{\mu}}G(x,x&#039;)=\delta(x-x&#039;)
 
I figure you never read (hence never edit) your posts after hitting "submit reply/thread" button. :-p

In the field eqn, the \varphi (x) is not a wavefunction, it is a classical field.

In the VEV of the time-ordered product, it is an operator acting on a Fock space. It still keeps the scalar behavior wrt restricted Poincare' transformations.

As for the second part of your post, please supply the reference to Schwinger's paper.

Daniel.
 
A brief resume..can be found at:

http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/102/22/7783

with the Dirac equation + magnetic field+ scalar potential V(x) and the functional approach to the Green function involving functional derivatives.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top