Tekneek
- 70
- 0
Why is the limit not just infinity?
wouldn't it be (1-infinity)/(1+infinity)?
wouldn't it be (1-infinity)/(1+infinity)?
The discussion revolves around the behavior of limits as they approach zero, particularly focusing on the expression involving infinity and how it relates to specific limit calculations. Participants explore various mathematical expressions and their limits, questioning the interpretation of limits involving infinity.
Participants express differing views on the interpretation of limits involving infinity, with no consensus reached on whether such limits should be considered as infinity or evaluated differently. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing interpretations of the limits presented.
There are unresolved mathematical steps and varying assumptions about the behavior of limits as they approach zero, particularly in expressions involving infinity. The discussion highlights the complexity of limit evaluation and the potential for different outcomes based on algebraic manipulation.
mfb said:Why should "-infinity/infinity" be infinity?
What is the limit of
$$\lim_{s \to 0} \frac{\frac{-1}{2}}{\frac{2}{s}}$$?
mfb said:Sorry typo, this is the formula I meant:
$$\lim_{s \to 0} \frac{\frac{-1}{s}}{\frac{2}{s}}$$
But the more important part was the first question.
That is not the point. It follows the "-infinity/infinity" type. It is easy to simplify it here to see the limit is not infinity, so your original idea cannot work - that was the purpose of the example.Tekneek said:For that formula it would be -1/2.
I don't understand that question.I was thinking it would be infinity because you really can't put down a number with it unless maybe it is 1?
Okay.EDIT: Nvm go it. It ends up being -35/40. Thnx
Tekneek said:Why is the limit not just infinity?
![]()
wouldn't it be (1-infinity)/(1+infinity)?
No, check your algebra. The answer in post #1 (-7/8) is correct.Garrulo said:The limit is of (s-1)/(s+(10*(2s+4)/7(s+5) that doing s=0 result in -7/15