Is the Maximum Always the Same as the Supremum in an Open Interval?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hammonjj
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maximum Supremum
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of supremum and maximum within the context of the open interval (0, 4) in the real numbers. Participants are exploring the definitions and differences between these two mathematical terms, particularly in relation to intervals that do not include their endpoints.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to determine whether the maximum exists for the interval (0, 4) and how it relates to the supremum. There is confusion regarding the definition of maximum, particularly in relation to values approaching the endpoint of the interval.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the definitions of maximum and supremum, noting that the maximum does not exist for the open interval (0, 4). Others are questioning their understanding of these concepts and exploring the implications of their definitions.

Contextual Notes

Participants are discussing the implications of the interval being open, which affects the existence of the maximum. There is also mention of the nature of numbers within the interval and their relationship to the supremum.

hammonjj
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For each subset of ℝ, give its supremum and maximum, if they exist. Otherwise, write none.


Homework Equations


d) (0,4)

The Attempt at a Solution


For part d, if the problem were [0,4], both the supremum and maximum would be 4, since the interval includes the end points, but I'm not sure about when it doesn't. It seems to me that the supremum would still be 4, as that qualifies as a least upper bound because 4 is in the neighborhood of the set, but is the maximum also 4? I don't think it would be since the interval does not include end points, but I'm confused!

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hammonjj said:

Homework Statement


For each subset of ℝ, give its supremum and maximum, if they exist. Otherwise, write none.


Homework Equations


d) (0,4)

The Attempt at a Solution


For part d, if the problem were [0,4], both the supremum and maximum would be 4, since the interval includes the end points, but I'm not sure about when it doesn't. It seems to me that the supremum would still be 4, as that qualifies as a least upper bound because 4 is in the neighborhood of the set, but is the maximum also 4? I don't think it would be since the interval does not include end points, but I'm confused!

Thanks!

You aren't too confused. You are correct that the max is not 4. Does the max even exist?
 
LCKurtz said:
You aren't too confused. You are correct that the max is not 4. Does the max even exist?

I think it does, but I don't know what to call it. Since my interval is a subset of the real numbers, there's some x=4-ε, where x is the maximum and ε is some tiny interval that, when subtracted from 4, gives you the maximum of the set.

Am I making this too complicated? Does the max have to be some integer?
 
hammonjj said:
I think it does, but I don't know what to call it. Since my interval is a subset of the real numbers, there's some x=4-ε, where x is the maximum and ε is some tiny interval that, when subtracted from 4, gives you the maximum of the set.

Am I making this too complicated? Does the max have to be some integer?
No, you are not making it too complicated, nor does the maximum have to be an integer. However, what you are saying, "there's some x=4-ε, where x is the maximum and ε is some tiny interval that, when subtracted from 4, gives you the maximum of the set" is wrong. The maximum of a set is, by definition the largest number in that set. If the set were "[0, 4]" or "(0, 4]" then the maximum would be 4. But (0, 4) is the set of all numbers larger than 0 and less than 4. If "x" is in that set, what could you say about (x+ 4)/2?
 
HallsofIvy said:
No, you are not making it too complicated, nor does the maximum have to be an integer. However, what you are saying, "there's some x=4-ε, where x is the maximum and ε is some tiny interval that, when subtracted from 4, gives you the maximum of the set" is wrong. The maximum of a set is, by definition the largest number in that set. If the set were "[0, 4]" or "(0, 4]" then the maximum would be 4. But (0, 4) is the set of all numbers larger than 0 and less than 4. If "x" is in that set, what could you say about (x+ 4)/2?

Since x is in the interval (0,4), that is x is less than 4, (x+4)/2 is in that interval.
 
HallsofIvy said:
No, you are not making it too complicated, nor does the maximum have to be an integer. However, what you are saying, "there's some x=4-ε, where x is the maximum and ε is some tiny interval that, when subtracted from 4, gives you the maximum of the set" is wrong. The maximum of a set is, by definition the largest number in that set. If the set were "[0, 4]" or "(0, 4]" then the maximum would be 4. But (0, 4) is the set of all numbers larger than 0 and less than 4. If "x" is in that set, what could you say about (x+ 4)/2?

hammonjj said:
Since x is in the interval (0,4), that is x is less than 4, (x+4)/2 is in that interval.

Even better, it is between x and 4. Hall's point is that any number x you might use for the maximum has to be in the interval so it is less than 4. Yet (x+4)/2 is in the interval and greater than x. So...?
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K