B Is the Motion of a Pendulum Described by a Harmonic Oscillator Model?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the motion of a pendulum can be accurately described by a harmonic oscillator model, particularly at an amplitude of φ = 0.250 ± 0.002 rad. Participants debate the conditions for harmonicity, noting that while the approximation ##\sin\phi \approx \phi## is generally acceptable, the oscillations may not be isochronous due to the dependence of the period on amplitude. There is a consensus that for small angles, like 0.25 rad, the pendulum's motion can be considered practically harmonic, though not strictly so. The conversation also touches on the need for experimental criteria to define harmonicity and the potential for using Fourier analysis to assess distortion. Ultimately, the conclusion is that while the pendulum's motion approaches harmonic behavior, it does not fully meet the criteria for being classified as such.
sergiokapone
Messages
306
Reaction score
17
TL;DR Summary
This is not homework, I'm to old for. I came up with this problem, and I want to check whether it is suitable.
It is necessary to make a mechanism, the basis of which should be oscillation of the pendulum with an amplitude φ = 0.250 ± 0.002 rad. Is it possible to describe the motion of the pendulum to use a harmonic oscillator model?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
But with the condition, the ##\sin\phi < \phi##, and difference between periods is about ##\frac{\Delta T}{T_0} =0.004##.
 
Last edited:
Yes. So ?
 
I thaught, the condition of harmonicity is ##\sin\phi =\phi##, and with aquaried degree of accuracy, we can't cosider the oscillations as harmonic.
 
How accurate do you want your description to be ?
0.25 isn't that big an angle !
And the correction for T is easily made.

There is no distinction between the lines in fig 1, 2 and 3 here ,
i.e. up to 0.75

So what is the complete set of requirements for your design ?
 
As mentioned in first post φ = 0.250 ± 0.002.

As described in general courses of physics, the condition of harmonicity is an aprroximate equality ##\sin\phi \approx \phi##. Physically, what is that mean? How closer to a strict equality it should be? That is my main question.As I think, for verifying harmonicity is sufficient to compare sinus of an angle with angle with desire accuracy. But maybe I loosing something important, I don't know.
 
Last edited:
sergiokapone said:
As mentioned in first post φ = 0.250 ± 0.002.
Yes, I read that. Reason I asked is that you do not tell what is being designed or what the complete set of requirements is. φ = 0.250 ± 0.002 does not impose any constraints on the shape or the period of the oscillation. It can just as well be a block wave with exactly φ = 0.250 ± 0.002.

What do you mean with
sergiokapone said:
verifying harmonicity
 
There are an harmonic oscillatios, described with some type of differential equation, and there are non harmonic oscillators, for example, gravitational pendulums, described with differential equation with sinus type of nonlinearity. Can it be consider the gravitational pendulums as harmonic? In general case, obviously, not. At a large amplitude the osccilations is not a harmonic, but at low there is yes, and there is no sharp border between, of course. But what experimental criteria one can propose for considering oscillation as a harmonic at a some abstract conditions?
 
  • #10
sergiokapone said:
But what experimental criteria one can propose for counting oscillation as a harmonic at a some abstract conditions?
Did you look in the links I gave ?
(here is another one) One can propose to take the relative amplitude of the ##(2l+1)## (with ##l=1##) harmonic as a measure of distortion of the cosinusoidal motion and specify an upper bound for it.
Or one can look at the pictures:
Belendez said:
We can conclude that for amplitudes lower than 135o the periodic motion exhibited by a simple pendulum is practically harmonic but its oscillations are not isochronous (the period is a function of the initial amplitude)
which basically says the bold line in his figure 4 is still sufficiently cosinusoidal ...
 
  • #11
About Belendez article. I always thaught, the harmonic oscillatios is always isochronous. But I don't understand, what does it mean "practically" harmonic. Whose practice? Does it mean if the condition ##\sin\phi =\phi## with desired accuracy is sattisfied, the oscillations are harmonic, but perhaps this is not isochronous, and we should check the accuracy for the period value?
 
Last edited:
  • #12
I suppose one could determine the total harmonic distortion for the Fourier expansion in the last link (let us know the result if you do :smile: ) to find out what Belendez still finds "practically undistorted". For me the pictures 1 2 and 3 are good enough and your 0.250 is still below the ##0.1\pi## of fig. 1 !
 
  • #13
I thought so: I know the equation of my gravitational pendulum ##\ddot\phi + \omega_0^2\sin\phi = 0##, and also I know the equation of harmonic oscillatior ##\ddot\phi + \omega_0^2\phi = 0##. Ok, then for describing my pendulum as harmonic oscillator, I must satisfy the condition ##\sin\phi = \phi##, because only with this condition differential equations will become similar. But I see the my ##\sin0.250 = 0.247 < 0.250 \pm 0.002## (##\sin## is slightly lower than I need), so my conclusion, the ocillations are not harmonic therefore not isochronous.

PS It turns out that I am trying to determine the harmonicity of the oscillations using the differential equation (DE), but perhaps it would be more correct to do this using a solution of DE, as Belendez proposed.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top