Is the Net Force at the Bottom of a Vertical Circle Greater or Lower Than MG?

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about the net force at the bottom of a vertical circle, it is clarified that the net force is directed upward and is indeed greater than the gravitational force (mg). The confusion arises from the distinction between tension and net force; while tension at the bottom must exceed mg to provide the necessary centripetal force, the net force is the result of the tension minus the gravitational force. At the bottom of the circle, the upward tension adds to the downward gravitational force, leading to a net force that is greater than mg. Understanding this difference is crucial for grasping the dynamics of circular motion. The key takeaway is that as long as tension exceeds mg, there will be a net centripetal force present.
HelloMotto
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
You are whirling a rubber stopper of mass something attached to a string in a vertical circle at high constant speed. At the bottom of the circle, the net force that causes acceleration is

my answer was Vertically upward and greater in magnitude than MG.
but the answer in the book says
vertically upward and lower in magnitude than mg.

WHY? I don't get this.
At the bottom of the circle, The Centripetal force is the difference of Force tension pointing upwards and force of gravity pointing downwards. So if the netforce is smaller than MG, then there can't be a centripetal force...

please help me out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I'm understanding you correctly, you are talking about the tension of bottom vs. top?

The top has less magnitude because the tension [up] is reduced by the Fg [down]. At the bottom, the magnitude is greater because it's tension [down] PLUS Fg [down].
 
You are thinking about the tension while they are asking about net force. As long as the tension is greater than MG, there will be some net centripetal force.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top