Is the Noether current physically observable in experiments?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kau
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current Physical
kau
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
I have very simple questions. Although these are simple but I am confused. So if I start with a lagrangian of the following form $$ \mathcal{L} = \partial^{\mu}\phi \partial_{\mu} \phi^{*} -m^{2} \phi^{*} \phi $$ then I get a current for the global invariance of the lagrangian and that is of the form $$ J^{\mu}=i(\partial^{\mu} \phi \phi^{*} -\partial^{\mu} \phi^{*} \phi) ... (1 )$$Then if I demand local gauge invariance then definitely we get gauge field terms in the lagrangian. Then if we find an expression of current for the global invariance of ##\phi## field we get expression $$ J^{\mu}=i(D^{\mu}\phi \phi^{*} -D^{\mu}\phi^{*} \phi) ...(2) $$ And there is other expression for current which is conserved on local gauge invariance but they are not physical since they are not gauge invariant. But global ones are gauge invariant and therefore it's ok to have their physical presence in the theory. But I am confused that which one is physical 1 or 2 or both? One more thing is these currents or the global charge defined from it is due to the symmetry of the theory ,not external ones. So in principle we don't see them. Is this right?
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Noether currents are symmetry currents. They depend on the fields (in the Lagrangian) and their transformations laws under the symmetry group of the Lagrangian. Your first current follows from the Free fields Lagrangian \mathcal{L}_{0} = \mathcal{L}_{0}(\varphi_{a} , \partial_{\mu}\varphi_{a}) , using J_{(1)}^{\mu} = \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}_{0}}{\partial (\partial_{\mu}\varphi_{a})} \delta \varphi_{a} .
Your second current follows from a different Lagrangian \mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L}(\varphi_{a} , \partial_{\mu}\varphi_{a} - i A_{\mu}\varphi_{a}) . This Lagrangian describes an interacting field theory, its symmetry current is J_{(2)}^{\mu} = \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_{\mu}\varphi_{a})} \delta \varphi_{a} = \frac{\partial{L}}{\partial A_{\mu}} . Comparing the two currents is like comparing apples with oranges. They are the global symmetry currents of two different theories. Therefore, each current is the physical current of the corresponding theory.

Sam
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and kau
samalkhaiat said:
Noether currents are symmetry currents. They depend on the fields (in the Lagrangian) and their transformations laws under the symmetry group of the Lagrangian. Your first current follows from the Free fields Lagrangian \mathcal{L}_{0} = \mathcal{L}_{0}(\varphi_{a} , \partial_{\mu}\varphi_{a}) , using J_{(1)}^{\mu} = \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}_{0}}{\partial (\partial_{\mu}\varphi_{a})} \delta \varphi_{a} .
Your second current follows from a different Lagrangian \mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L}(\varphi_{a} , \partial_{\mu}\varphi_{a} - i A_{\mu}\varphi_{a}) . This Lagrangian describes an interacting field theory, its symmetry current is J_{(2)}^{\mu} = \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_{\mu}\varphi_{a})} \delta \varphi_{a} = \frac{\partial{L}}{\partial A_{\mu}} . Comparing the two currents is like comparing apples with oranges. They are the global symmetry currents of two different theories. Therefore, each current is the physical current of the corresponding theory.

Sam
Ok. thanks for the response. I have another concern about this. Does this current have anything to do with experiments? can you see them in the experiment or something like that. Or this current just signify the symmetry of the theory and to some extent we can infer if there is some conserved thing like that then there is some matter present that is like having finite chemical potential. That's it.
Another thing is in Schwartz's qft book it is mentioned that in fixed spacetime dimension this thing is true although if that is not the case ( e.g. AdS/CFT) then we can have the global current conserved in gauge theory. Can you elucidate this part?
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top