Is the Normal Force Always Equal to the Weight of an Object?

AI Thread Summary
The normal force is defined as a contact force that is perpendicular to the contact surface between two solid objects, making this the only accurate statement among the options discussed. It is not always equal to the weight of an object, especially on inclined planes where its direction and magnitude can change. The normal force is not the net force acting on a system; rather, it is a component of the net force, which is the sum of all forces acting on an object. Additionally, the term "solid" is relevant as it affects the friction dynamics between objects. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for accurately applying the concept of normal force in physics.
PhysicsCCR
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Which is true/false? When a force is called a "normal force", it is:

A force that is always equal to the weight of the object.

A force that is perpendicular to the surface of the Earth at any given location.

A contact force perpendicular to the contact surface between two solid objects.

The net force acting on the system.

A force that is always vertical.

I answered: true, true, not sure, not sure, true(?).
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Why not look up the definition of normal force? And answer based on that.
 
A contact force perpendicular to the contact surface between two 'solid' objects.

only this one is correct!
however, 'solid' is a funny way to describe this. You would then need to define a solid, which is chemistry based, however, it does make sense to add 'solid' into the statement, because then the force of contact between to objects that are not 'solid' redefines the friction dynamics of these forms of contact. Only a Normal force can create kinetic or static friction. Other than that, the friction would be considered 'drag' force or 'viscous' force, etc. You understand what I'm saying?
 
"I answered: true, true, not sure, not sure, true(?)."

For your first answer, think about how the normal force can change on an incline plane. Do you know what that looks like?

For your second answer, also think about how the normal force vector directs on an incline plane.

For your third answer, refer to what I talked about on the previous comment.

For your fourth answer, a net force describes the force of effect. You see what I mean? When there is a cause (a force) then the effect is (net force), which is defined as the sum of the forces. Therefore, a normal force is only an element of the net force. They are not the same.

For the fifth answer, think about what vertical means and how the vector of the normal force can change.
 
All right, thank you for all your help!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top