Is the Number of Elements in a Set Equal to Its Power Set?

Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44

Homework Statement


Show that ##\bigcup \{\mathcal{P} X : X \in A \} \subseteq \mathcal{P} \bigcup A##

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Suppose that ##c \in \bigcup \{\mathcal{P} X : X \in A \}##. Then by definition this means that ##\exists a \in A## such that ##c \in \mathcal{P} a##, or, equivalently, ##\exists a \in A## such that ##c \subseteq a##, which implies that ##c \subseteq \bigcup A## which means that ##c \in \mathcal{P} \bigcup A##.

Is this a correct proof? Also, why can't I just reverse the argument that that we have equality between sets and not just one being a subset of the other
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mr Davis 97 said:

Homework Statement


Show that ##\bigcup \{\mathcal{P} X : X \in A \} \subseteq \mathcal{P} \bigcup A##

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Suppose that ##c \in \bigcup \{\mathcal{P} X : X \in A \}##. Then by definition this means that ##\exists a \in A## such that ##c \in \mathcal{P} a##, or, equivalently, ##\exists a \in A## such that ##c \subseteq a##, which implies that ##c \subseteq \bigcup A## which means that ##c \in \mathcal{P} \bigcup A##.

Is this a correct proof? Also, why can't I just reverse the argument that that we have equality between sets and not just one being a subset of the other

It looks ok to me. As for why not the reverse, compare the power set of ##\{1,2\}## with the union of the power sets of ##\{1\}## and ##\{2\}##.
 
  • Like
Likes Mr Davis 97
Dick said:
It looks ok to me. As for why not the reverse, compare the power set of ##\{1,2\}## with the union of the power sets of ##\{1\}## and ##\{2\}##.
When would equality hold? It seems that it would hold iff ##|A| = 1##, but I am not sure how to prove this.
 
Mr Davis 97 said:
When would equality hold? It seems that it would hold iff ##|A| = 1##, but I am not sure how to prove this.

Count the elements in each set. If ##|A|=n## then the power set has ##2^n## elements.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top