Is the Operator C Hermitian and What are the Eigenfunctions and Eigenvalues?

Domnu
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
Problem
Consider the operator \hat{C} which satisfies the property that \hat{C} \phi (x) = \phi ^ * (x). Is \hat{C} Hermitian? What are the eigenfunctions and eigenvalues of \hat{C}?

Solution
We have

\hat{C} \phi = \phi ^ *
\iff \phi^* \hat{C}^\dagger = \phi

Substituting back into the first equation,
\hat{C} (\phi^* \hat{C}^\dagger) = \phi ^ * = \hat{C} \phi
\iff (\hat{C} \phi)(\hat{C} - I) = 0

Now, we know that \hat{C} \phi \neq 0, since (we assume that) \phi isn't zero... if \hat{C} = 0, then the original property that \hat{C} satisfied couldn't possibly be true. Thus, we have that \hat{C} = I, which is clearly Hermitian.

Since \hat{C} is just the identity operator, we know that all functions are the eigenfunctions of \hat{C} and the only eigenvalue of \hat{C} is 1.

Could someone verify that the above is true? It seems too simple =/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
C is OBVIOUSLY not the identity. It's the complex conjugation operator. It takes a function into it's complex conjugate. The identity takes a function into itself. Are you sure you can't think of any eigenstates of C?? They are pretty easy. Then write down the definition of Hermitian without trying to think of C as a matrix.
 
Dick said:
C is OBVIOUSLY not the identity. It's the complex conjugation operator. It takes a function into it's complex conjugate. The identity takes a function into itself. Are you sure you can't think of any eigenstates of C?? They are pretty easy. Then write down the definition of Hermitian without trying to think of C as a matrix.

Heh, whoops... I see that all real functions are eigenstates for C. And C is not Hermitian... my calculation messed up in the factorization, which is incorrect. It's not Hermitian, because

\langle a | C b \rangle = \langle a | b^* \rangle = a^* b^*
\langle Ca | b \rangle = \langle a^* | b \rangle = ab

We can see that all forms of e^{i\alpha} are eigenvalues, where \alpha is some real number. This is because

C \phi = p \phi \iff \phi^* = p \phi \iff \phi = p^* \phi^* \iff \phi^* = pp^* \phi^* \iff p^*p = 1 \iff p = e^{i \alpha}

for some \alpha \in \mathbb{R}. Thanks a bunch for the help and motivation to solve the problem!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top