Is the partial derivative for acceleration correctly solved?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on verifying the correctness of equations related to calculating uncertainty in acceleration and gravity in a physics lab. Participants express confusion over the application of partial derivatives, particularly in the context of measuring gravity (g) and its uncertainty. There is a debate about the accuracy of the initial equations provided, with some claiming the first two equations are incorrect. Additionally, questions arise regarding the methodology used to measure acceleration (a) and its relation to gravity. Clarification on the derivatives and the specific equations referenced is sought to ensure accurate calculations.
niteshadw
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
can anyone verify that the equations on the following page, http://nsr.f2o.org/equations.htm are corretly solved. The equations are used to find the uncertainity in the calculation of acceleration in my physics lab. The uncertinty (delta a) would be the sum of all of the four equations, which appear correct.

However, the last equation, solves for the uncertainty in g (delta g) which is gravity...I'm not sure how should I solve it using partial derivatives, on the bottom it has what h_21 and x_12 should be...any help would be much appreciated..thank you!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What did you do in your lab to measure g? It sort of looks like you made two position measurements and two velocity measurements, with some uncertainty. There must be some time interval involved. Is there a time interval uncertainty? How is "a" different from "g"? Is not your calculated "a" an estimate of "g"?
 
People see the pdf of the lab, the equation is on last page (pg 10) Thank you! http://nsr.f2o.org/exp2.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
niteshadw said:
People see the pdf of the lab, the equation is on last page (pg 10) Thank you! http://nsr.f2o.org/exp2.pdf

The first four dequations in your original note attachement come from taking partial derivatives of equation 2-7 in the write-up. The first two are wrong. What is

\frac{d}{dx}x^2

You have not done the derivatives for your Equation 5. They come from equation 2-5 in the write-up
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top