Is the Pauli Exclusion Principle Linked to Chemical Stability?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the Pauli Exclusion Principle and the stability of chemical structures. It posits that the Pauli principle raises energy levels, leading to the conclusion that systems with fermions, such as electrons in shells, may exhibit less stability and higher reactivity compared to bosons. The conversation highlights that pairing electrons with opposite spins incurs an energy cost, which accounts for the observed half-filled electron shells and the variations in ionization energies across the periodic table. This suggests a direct link between electron configuration, energy states, and chemical reactivity.
relativityfan
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
hi,

i believe there is a clear cut relationship between the pauli exclusion principle and the thermodynamical/chemical stability in chemistry. the pauli principle rises the energy level, and stability occurs for the lowest energy states. does that mean that a consequence of the pauli principle is necessarily less stability, and that fermions structures or substructures(electron shells) are necessarily less stable, more reactive than bosons?

thank you for your reply
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org


I'll try to answer the first part of your post. The pairing of electrons with opposite spin in an orbital has an energy cost associated with it This explains why we see half-filled shells before the system pairs electrons in an orbital (and explains the discontinuities in the ionization energies across a row of the periodic table).
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top