Is the quantum efficiency of a photodiode dependent upon its temperature?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the temperature of a photodiode and its quantum efficiency (QE), particularly regarding voltage and current generation. It is noted that temperature affects the ideal diode equation, suggesting that efficiency may improve at lower temperatures, although reverse leakage current increases with temperature could diminish overall performance. A user reports significant QE drift in their photodiode sensor, far exceeding the expected 0.05% per degree Celsius, despite minimal temperature variation in their lab. The conversation also explores potential causes for the drift, including the type of amplifier used and possible noise interference. The user hopes that switching to current-sensing amplifiers will resolve the issue.
Topher925
Messages
1,562
Reaction score
7
Like the title states, is the voltage produced by a photodiode, or any PV device for that matter, dependent upon that devices temperature? To rephrase, if you have a fixed amount of photons coming in contact with the business end of a photodiode, is the voltage or current generated by the photodiode dependent upon the diode's temperature?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
At the very least, the reverse leakage current will increase with temperature, so even if the photons are generating electron current, some of that current gets stolen back as reverse leakage before doing anything useful.

Do you have a specific application in mind, Topher?
 
berkeman said:
Do you have a specific application in mind, Topher?

Yes, I'm trying to use a photodiode for a sensor but the thing seems to be drifting all over the place. Its QE seems to change quite a bit over a period of hours and I can't figure out why. The data sheet says the QE should only change about 0.05%/C at the wavelength I am using but its more like 50-75%. The lab temperature I'm using it in only varies by 2-3C over a period of a day so there shouldn't be that large of a drift. I'm hoping I just have something hooked up wrong.
 
Last edited:
Hmm, that is weird. How much reverse bias are you using in your current-to-voltage converter amp for the photodiode? Are there other sources of noise, either RF or light, that could be causing the drift?
 
berkeman said:
Hmm, that is weird. How much reverse bias are you using in your current-to-voltage converter amp for the photodiode? Are there other sources of noise, either RF or light, that could be causing the drift?

At the moment I'm just using an instrument amplifier (voltage sensing) because it has fantastic noise rejection but I'm going to try using one with current sensing. My original set up used a shunted resistor with the photodiode in reverse bias but I still think I got a lot of drift from that set up too.

The sensor including the photodiode is optically sealed and there isn't any significant noise. I tested the entire circuit and its rock solid, as in no drift for a period of weeks with drastic changes in temperature. Hopefully when I get some current sense amplifiers the drift will go away.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Back
Top