Is the Riemann Zeta Function of 0 Infinity or -1/2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dimension10
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The Riemann zeta function at 0 is often cited as -1/2, despite some confusion suggesting it could be infinity. The function is originally defined for s > 1, and for s ≤ 1, it relies on an analytic continuation that provides a unique extension. This extension allows the function to be evaluated at points where the original series diverges. There are multiple representations for the zeta function when s < 1, which can be explored further in mathematical resources. Understanding these concepts clarifies the apparent contradiction regarding the value of the zeta function at 0.
dimension10
Messages
371
Reaction score
0
The riemann zeta function of 0 is supposed to be -1/2. But isn't it infinity?

1/1^0 +1/2^0+1/3^0+1/4^0+...
1/1+1/1+1/1+1/1+...
1+1+1+1+...
infinity

But many sources claim that it is -1/2
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
dimension10 said:
The riemann zeta function of 0 is supposed to be -1/2. But isn't it infinity?

1/1^0 +1/2^0+1/3^0+1/4^0+...
1/1+1/1+1/1+1/1+...
1+1+1+1+...
infinity

But many sources claim that it is -1/2

Yes, you are correct, but the definition af the Riemann-zeta function as

\zeta (s)=\sum_{n=1}^{+\infty}{\frac{1}{n^s}}

is only defined as s>1 (or in the complex case, as Re(s)>1). The Riemann-zeta function for s\leq 1 is defined as the "analytic continuation" of the above function. That is: the unique function that looks most like \zeta(s),s&gt;1.
 
micromass said:
is only defined as s>1 (or in the complex case, as Re(s)>1). The Riemann-zeta function for s\leq 1 is defined as the "analytic continuation" of the above function. That is: the unique function that looks most like \zeta(s),s&gt;1.

The sum has infinitely many continuous extensions to the real line, but only one analytical extension to the complex plane.
 
disregardthat said:
The sum has infinitely many continuous extensions to the real line, but only one analytical extension to the complex plane.

Well, a meromorphic extension really, since there is a pole in 1.
 
micromass said:
Well, a meromorphic extension really, since there is a pole in 1.

You are right about that :redface:
 
micromass said:
Yes, you are correct, but the definition af the Riemann-zeta function as

\zeta (s)=\sum_{n=1}^{+\infty}{\frac{1}{n^s}}

is only defined as s>1 (or in the complex case, as Re(s)>1). The Riemann-zeta function for s\leq 1 is defined as the "analytic continuation" of the above function. That is: the unique function that looks most like \zeta(s),s&gt;1.

Thanks, but is there a formula for s<1?
 
Back
Top