Is the Saddle Point Expansion Valid for Finite Values of x?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kevin_spencer2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Point
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the validity of the saddle point expansion for finite values of x, specifically when evaluating the integral of e^(xf(t)). The traditional saddle point method is applicable as x approaches infinity, leading to an expansion that includes a series of terms involving a(n). The inquiry explores the implications of setting x to finite values like 1, raising questions about the existence of the sum S and its Borel summability for these cases. The conversation emphasizes the need for a comprehensive understanding of the series behavior at finite x. Overall, the validity of the saddle point expansion for finite x remains a complex topic requiring further exploration.
Kevin_spencer2
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
To evaluate the integral

\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dt e^{xf(t)} whenever x is 'big' (tending to infinity) we use the saddle point expansion so:

\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dt e^{xf(t)}\sim g(x)\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a_{n}x^{-n}

Of course the expansion above is just valid for x---> infinite, but what would happen if i put x=1 and hence i must find the sum for the a(n):

\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a(n) = S will at least S exist in the sense of a 'Borel summable' series to calculate the integral for x=1,2,3,4,...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top