Is the Smart Tweezers R-L-C Meter Accurate Enough for Through-Hole Devices?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chrisych
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Meter
AI Thread Summary
The Smart Tweezers R-L-C Meter allows for measurements of through-hole devices without desoldering, but its accuracy is questioned due to the potential influence of parallel components in the circuit. Accurate readings of resistance, inductance, or capacitance cannot be guaranteed when components are wired in parallel with unknown values. Users report that while the device can provide rough estimates, it may yield inconsistent results, necessitating desoldering for precise measurements. Concerns are also raised about using active impedance probes on completed boards, as they could damage sensitive circuits. Overall, the Smart Tweezers R-L-C Meter is convenient but should be used with caution for accurate diagnostics.
chrisych
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Recently, I found a R-L-C Meter called Smart Tweezers R-L-C Meter from the
website of http://www.advancedevices.com/products_tw.htm" .

It is quite similar to the Chinese Chopsticks that can be used to take
measurements from the devices already mounted on a board.

For the through-hole devices, we should desolder one of the legs (two-pin
components) in order to measure the specified value, said R value,
correctly.

However, it can take the measurement directly without any desoldering
process. Is it accurate enough? Any comment?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
If you have a R or L or C component already in a circuit
with other components, there could be any arbitrary
other 'R', 'L', or 'C' components electrically wired in parallel
with that component.

Thus the reading you would get across the two circuit
nodes of one component would measure not only that
component's reactance, but the parallel combination
of that component and whatever else is in parallel with
it.

So it cannot be possible to measure the R, L, or C in
of one such component while it is wired in parallel with
an unknown set of other components.

What is the resistance of a 1 million ohm resistor in parallel
with a 3 ohm resistor in parallel with an
1 ohm resistor? Whatever component you could seek
to measure would not be accurately measurable because
of the presence of the others unless you desoldered
one of the leads to remove the paralleled components
from the device under test.

I would not apply any active impedance probe to a
completed board either because it is possible that the
probe applies voltages to the board that might be of
a polarity and magnitude that would damage circuits on
the board. I guess it'd be safe for most things if
the applied voltage was limited to 0.05V peak, though
if there was resonance even that could lead to high enough
voltages to damage something that wasn't designed to
encounter signal magnitudes of that level.

Proper ESD control is of course always necessary.
 
actually I've use one of these before. convenient to determine surface mount capacitor value. i wouldn't trust this whole accurately it does work to some extend (you do not need to unsolder etc) but often times you will need to remove 1 leg.

I use this just to give me a rough idea of the capacitor i am measuring but don't rely on it so much, sometimes comes up is weird but often times it is quite close.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top