Is the Transformed Function a Solution to Laplace's Equation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the transformed function \(\psi = \frac{1}{r} \phi\left(\frac{x}{r^2}, \frac{y}{r^2}, \frac{z}{r^2}\right)\) is a solution to Laplace's equation, given that \(\phi(x,y,z)\) is. Participants emphasize the need to compute the Laplacian of \(\psi\) directly rather than assuming it is a solution. They suggest using spherical coordinates for clarity and making substitutions to simplify the derivatives involved. Challenges in calculating the necessary partial derivatives are noted, with requests for more explicit steps in the derivation process. The conversation highlights the complexity of the problem and the importance of careful mathematical manipulation.
merrypark3
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that

If \phi(x,y,z) is a solution of Laplace's equation, show that
\frac{1}{r}\phi (\frac{x}{r^2} ,\frac{y}{r^2} , \frac{z}{r^2} ) is also a solution


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



let \psi= \frac{1}{r} \phi (\frac{x}{r^2} ,\frac{y}{r^2} , \frac{z}{r^2} ) is a solution.

Then in the spherical coordinate,

\psi=\frac{1}{r} \phi ( \frac{1}{r} , \theta , \varphi )

So input \psi to the spherical laplace equation.

\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{∂}{∂r} (r^2 \frac{∂\psi}{∂r}) = \frac {2}{r^4} \frac{∂\phi}{∂r} - \frac{1}{r^3} \frac{∂^2 \phi}{∂r^2}

The derivation with other angles, same to the original one, except 1/r times factor.

But the r part for the original one is

\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{∂}{∂r} (r^2 \frac{∂\phi}{∂r}) = \frac {2}{r} \frac{∂\phi}{∂r} + \frac{∂^2 \phi}{∂r^2}

What's wrong with me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
merrypark3 said:
let \psi= \frac{1}{r} \phi (\frac{x}{r^2} ,\frac{y}{r^2} , \frac{z}{r^2} ) is a solution.

Here you are assuming what you are trying to prove. That is not usually a good idea.

Instead, just compute the Laplacian of \psi= \frac{1}{r} \phi (\frac{x}{r^2} ,\frac{y}{r^2} , \frac{z}{r^2} ) and show that it is zero if \nabla^2 \phi(x,y,z)=0

Then in the spherical coordinate,

\psi=\frac{1}{r} \phi ( \frac{1}{r} , \theta , \varphi )

No. What are x, y and z in terms of spherical coordinates r, \theta and \varphi? What does that make \frac{x}{r^2}, \frac{y}{r^2}, and \frac{z}{r^2}?
 


\psi= \frac{1}{r} \phi (\frac{x}{r^2} ,\frac{y}{r^2} , \frac{z}{r^2} )= \frac{1}{r} \phi(\frac{sin \theta cos\varphi}{r}, \frac{sin \theta sin\varphi}{r},\frac{cos \theta}{r})

\frac{∂}{∂r} \phi(\frac{sin \theta cos\varphi}{r}, \frac{sin \theta sin\varphi}{r},\frac{cos \theta}{r})= -( \frac{ sin\theta cos\varphi}{r^2} \frac{∂\phi}{∂(\frac{sin \theta cos\varphi}{r})}+\frac{ sin\theta sin\varphi}{r^2} \frac{∂\phi}{∂(\frac{sin \theta sin\varphi}{r})}+\frac{ cos\theta}{r^2}\frac{∂\phi}{∂(\frac{sin \theta sin\varphi}{r})} )

Then how can I calculate the terms like \frac{∂\phi}{∂(\frac{sin \theta cos\varphi}{r})}?
 
merrypark3 said:
\psi= \frac{1}{r} \phi (\frac{x}{r^2} ,\frac{y}{r^2} , \frac{z}{r^2} )= \frac{1}{r} \phi(\frac{sin \theta cos\varphi}{r}, \frac{sin \theta sin\varphi}{r},\frac{cos \theta}{r})

good.

\frac{∂}{∂r} \phi(\frac{sin \theta cos\varphi}{r}, \frac{sin \theta sin\varphi}{r},\frac{cos \theta}{r})= -( \frac{ sin\theta cos\varphi}{r^2} \frac{∂\phi}{∂(\frac{sin \theta cos\varphi}{r})}+\frac{ sin\theta sin\varphi}{r^2} \frac{∂\phi}{∂(\frac{sin \theta sin\varphi}{r})}+\frac{ cos\theta}{r^2}\frac{∂\phi}{∂(\frac{sin \theta sin\varphi}{r})} )

Then how can I calculate the terms like \frac{∂\phi}{∂(\frac{sin \theta cos\varphi}{r})}?

Just use a substitution like \bar{x} \equiv \frac{\sin \theta \cos\varphi}{r}, \bar{y} \equiv \frac{\sin \theta \sin\varphi}{r}, and \bar{z} \equiv \frac{\cos \theta}{r} to make it easier to write:

\frac{\partial \phi\left( \frac{x}{r^2} ,\frac{y}{r^2} , \frac{z}{r^2} \right)}{\partial (\frac{\sin \theta \cos\varphi}{r})} = \frac{ \partial \phi( \bar{x}, \bar{y}, \bar{z})}{ \partial \bar{x}}?

In the end, you should get something like \nabla^2 \psi = \text{some factor} * \left[ \frac{ \partial^2 \phi( \bar{x}, \bar{y}, \bar{z})}{ \partial^2 \bar{x}} + \frac{ \partial^2 \phi( \bar{x}, \bar{y}, \bar{z})}{ \partial^2 \bar{y}} + \frac{ \partial^2 \phi( \bar{x}, \bar{y}, \bar{z})}{ \partial^2 \bar{z}} \right]

Aside: Changing the size on all your posts makes them difficult to read (for my eyes anyways), please stop it.
 
I am stuck on this too

Hi!

I was just trying to solve this problem through this same approach (make the substitutions \overline{x}=\sin(\theta)\cos(\phi)/r, etc...). But it turns out to be *very* complicated. Do you have finished this one? Can you show me more explicit steps? Thanks a lot!
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top