Is the Uniformity of Electric Field Between Grounded Metallic Plates Possible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pcm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plates
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the electric field and potential between two metallic plates, where one plate is grounded and the other has a surface charge density. The grounding of the left plate implies its potential is zero, leading to the assumption that the electric field must be uniform and thus zero, which contradicts the presence of charge on the right plate. The user questions the validity of their conclusion that the electric field is zero everywhere, suggesting that the charge distribution on the plates may not be uniform. The conversation highlights the complexities of electric fields in configurations involving grounded and charged plates. Ultimately, the user seeks clarification on the assumptions made regarding the electric field and potential in this scenario.
pcm
Messages
76
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose there are 2 mettalic plates 1(left)&2(right). Left plate is grounded and right plate is given surface charge density sigma. Now since potential of left plate is 0, so there is no potential difference difference between infinity and plate and since field has to be uniform(?) it has to be zero otherwise there will be potentil diff between plate 1 and infinity . Now suppose the field between the plates is E.
Therefore potential of right plate will be Ed(d is distance between plates )..since field to the right of plate 2 is uniform it has to be zero or otherwise pd between plate 2 and infinity will be infinite..hence I conclude plate 2 is also at 0 potential .so E=0 everywhere which it can't be since I have charge on plate 2. What is wrong with it?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I am assuming plates to be infinite and that on all four faces charge is
uniformly distributed
 
"possibly" the charges distribute itself in such a way (non uniformly) that field is not zero everywhere, and at the same time potential of grounded plate is zero.
any comments on that...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top