Is the universe NOT accelerating ?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the misconception that the universe is not accelerating, with references to a video that allegedly supports this claim. Participants clarify that while Hubble's graph illustrates velocity versus distance, it does not indicate acceleration, which was established in the 1990s through supernova observations. The argument that older galaxies recede faster does not imply deceleration; rather, it reflects the nature of expanding space. The distinction between acceleration and velocity is emphasized, with acceleration referring to the rate of expansion rather than the speed of individual objects. The thread concludes with a note that the link to the video was removed, and further inquiries should be directed to a new thread in the cosmology section.
fencewalker
Messages
17
Reaction score
1
I tweeted neil Tyson, michio kaku and brian green the following:
[link deleted by moderator]

no responses yet, would like feedback - does the video make sense?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
What video?

Even without seeing the video, I'd hazard a guess that no, it does not make sense. The concept of the universe not accelerating is debunked here fairly regularly.
 
Last edited:
on youtube, search hubblesmisinterpretation.
and I didn't say it's not expanding, it's not accelerating - since the older the galaxy is, the faster it is
 
fencewalker said:
on youtube, search hubblesmisinterpretation.
and I didn't say it's not expanding, it's not accelerating - since the older the galaxy is, the faster it is

Sorry, my post should have the word accelerating where I have expanding. My corrected statement stands. The age of the light from the distant stars is taken into account.
 
but hubble's graph is velocity plotted against distance, which is not acceleration - it's velocity plotted against time. from oldest to newest, the graph shows DEceleration
 
The acceleration of the universe was not discovered in Hubble's time, but in the 1990's by many observations of specific types of supernovas. You are correct in that Hubble's graph shows velocity, not acceleration, however your argument that the since older galaxies are moving away faster than closer ones means the universe is decelerating is not correct. Objects within expanding space naturally recede at different velocities depending on how far apart they are. The further apart two objects are, the faster they recede from each other. This holds even when the expansion is steady and is neither accelerating nor decelerating. Let's be clear here. In this context, acceleration/deceleration means an increase or decrease in the rate of expansion, not the velocity of objects.

There are many posts here on PF's cosmology forum explaining this, so I suggest you start there. I believe the link in Phind's signature block may also help.

Now, since this thread's topic is about a video that inaccurately explains expansion, I have deleted the link to your twitter and am locking the thread. If you have specific questions about expansion, you may start a new thread in the cosmology section.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
2K
Views
257K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top