Is There a Better Way to Balance Chemical Equations Without Luck?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PPonte
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemical
AI Thread Summary
Balancing chemical equations can be challenging, especially with longer equations. While some users find success through practice and tips like balancing non-Hydrogen and non-Oxygen elements first, others seek a more systematic approach using equations. Suggestions include balancing polyatomic ions as groups and using simple charts to track atom counts on both sides of the equation. A mathematical method is also mentioned as a potential alternative for those looking for a structured solution. Overall, various strategies exist to improve the efficiency of balancing chemical equations.
PPonte
Doesn't exist a method alternative to the one done by luck to balance chemical equations? The small equations are easy to balance by luck, but with the long ones I lost a lot of time. Thank you. :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It takes a little bit of practice to get quick at doing it.

Some tips:
-Balance elements other than Hydrogen and Oxygen first
-Balance polyatomic ions as a group if they appear on both sides of the reaction
-Balance seperatly the elements that appear by themselves
-Use smallest whole-number coefficients
 
Thank you for your help, but I am investigating how to do it by a systhem of equations. I will try to remember your tips. More tips are accepted.
 
A slightly more mathmatical approach can be found at the bottom of this page,
http://www.rose-hulman.edu/~larsenjs/balance.htm
under the section entitled, "Who Needs Chemistry?"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mm, I don't know about using a more mathmatical approach but the way I do it is relatively easy. I make a simple chart...first, I write down all of the elements I'll be dealing with, then I make two columns. The first one is for how many atoms each element has on the left side of the equation (the reactants) and the second is for how many the right side of the equation (the product) has. That gives me an idea of what I'm dealing with...don't know if it'll help you or not though. ^_^
 
mrjeffy321 thank you, this was just what I was looking for. Thank you too, AngelShare, your chart seems very good.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
Back
Top