Is There a Binomial Formula for Circles, Spheres, and Tori?

JonnyMaddox
Messages
74
Reaction score
1
Hey JO,

You all know the binomic formulas I guess. Let's look at the first:
(a+b)^2=a^2+2ab+b^2
Now this can be interpretet as the area of a square with the sides (a+b). And that means the area of the square is decomposed into the components a^2,2ab and b^2. And this can also be done for a cube in three dimensions with (a+b)^3 and so on. My question is now if there is a similar formula for the area of a circle? Or in higher dimensions for a sphere or torus ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Not completetly trivial, but yes, there are such expressions. This lemma tells (part of) the story
 
Another use of the formula:
350px-Pythagoras_proof.svg.png

What can you prove from that figure and your formula?
 
  • Like
Likes Mentallic
JonnyMaddox said:
Hey JO,
My question is now if there is a similar formula for the area of a circle? Or in higher dimensions for a sphere or torus ?

Oh, this is a fascinating question we might be able to reason our way through. Let's start off with what we know. In your mapping of the algebraic binomial distribution to generalized Euclidian space, it's important to understand that the algebraic operator addition corresponds to the finite extension of a segment (one of Euclid's postulates) and that the product is delimitation of a rectangle on a Euclidian plane. The construction of a circle (a second Euclidian postulate) is fundamentally a different process whereby an arc is subtended. Now, is it possible to map a length to an arc? Yes, by way of a radius/diameter which can also be mapped to a length. And both are extensible, but what of the product? Let's try using the radii to find a relationship... Yes! Here's an analog to the relationship between the area of a rectangle subdivided:

If you have two circles ## \{A, B\} ## of radii ## \{a \sqrt{\pi}, b \sqrt{\pi} \} ## then their areas are ## \{ a^2 \pi^2, b^2 \pi^2 \}## respectively. Now, create a circle ## C ## of the radius ## (a + b) \sqrt{\pi} ##. It's area will be ## (a^2 + 2ab + b^ 2) \pi^2 ## which can be rewritten ## a^2 \pi^2 + 2ab \pi^2 + b^ 2 \pi^2 ##. Then it becomes evident that the sum of the areas of the first two circles plus this middle term are equal in area to the area of the third circle. What about the relation between the two terms? It look like the circumference but isn't.

The circumference is ## 2\pi (a + b)\sqrt{\pi} ## where as our center term is ## 2\pi (a\cdot b) \pi ##. So, our conversion factor (to turn what we have into the circumference of C) is ## \frac{ab\sqrt{\pi}}{a+b} ##.

So, from what I can tell the analog with circles does have a geometric interpretation, but it's nowhere as elegant.

## A_c = A_a + A_b + \frac{ab\sqrt{\pi}}{a+b}C_c \forall a, b \in ℝ##.

Is this what you're looking for?
 
aikismos said:
Oh, this is a fascinating question we might be able to reason our way through. Let's start off with what we know. In your mapping of the algebraic binomial distribution to generalized Euclidian space, it's important to understand that the algebraic operator addition corresponds to the finite extension of a segment (one of Euclid's postulates) and that the product is delimitation of a rectangle on a Euclidian plane. The construction of a circle (a second Euclidian postulate) is fundamentally a different process whereby an arc is subtended. Now, is it possible to map a length to an arc? Yes, by way of a radius/diameter which can also be mapped to a length. And both are extensible, but what of the product? Let's try using the radii to find a relationship... Yes! Here's an analog to the relationship between the area of a rectangle subdivided:

If you have two circles ## \{A, B\} ## of radii ## \{a \sqrt{\pi}, b \sqrt{\pi} \} ## then their areas are ## \{ a^2 \pi^2, b^2 \pi^2 \}## respectively. Now, create a circle ## C ## of the radius ## (a + b) \sqrt{\pi} ##. It's area will be ## (a^2 + 2ab + b^ 2) \pi^2 ## which can be rewritten ## a^2 \pi^2 + 2ab \pi^2 + b^ 2 \pi^2 ##. Then it becomes evident that the sum of the areas of the first two circles plus this middle term are equal in area to the area of the third circle. What about the relation between the two terms? It look like the circumference but isn't.

The circumference is ## 2\pi (a + b)\sqrt{\pi} ## where as our center term is ## 2\pi (a\cdot b) \pi ##. So, our conversion factor (to turn what we have into the circumference of C) is ## \frac{ab\sqrt{\pi}}{a+b} ##.

So, from what I can tell the analog with circles does have a geometric interpretation, but it's nowhere as elegant.

## A_c = A_a + A_b + \frac{ab\sqrt{\pi}}{a+b}C_c \forall a, b \in ℝ##.

Is this what you're looking for?

Ok thank you, that sounds nice. I'm trying to understand it. So what is the geometric interpretation? But next, what about spheres and tori? I think if I fully understood this I could put it up on Wikipedia as a generalisation of the binomic formula.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top