Is There a Calculus Relationship Between These Kinematics Equations?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the relationship between kinematic equations, specifically how the velocity equation is derived from the position equation through calculus. It confirms that the velocity of an object is the time-derivative of its position function. Participants clarify that the final velocity is a variable dependent on time, not a constant. One user seeks to derive another kinematic equation from the existing ones but later decides to look for answers elsewhere. The conversation emphasizes the interconnectedness of these equations in kinematics.
tahayassen
Messages
269
Reaction score
1
{ y }_{ f }={ y }_{ i }+{ v }_{ yi }t+\frac { 1 }{ 2 } { a }_{ y }{ t }^{ 2 }\\ { v }_{ yf }={ v }_{ yi }+{ a }_{ y }t

It almost looks like the second equation is the derivative of the first equation with respect to time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Exactly. The velocity of an object is simply the time-derivative of its position function.
 


Pengwuino said:
Exactly. The velocity of an object is simply the time-derivative of its position function.

Maybe I'm incredibly rusty on my calculus, but isn't the time-derivative of the first equation the following?

0={ v }_{ yi }+{ a }_{ y }t
 


##v_{yf}## isn't a constant, it's a variable, more specifically the dependent variable, a function of t. Written as functions, your two equations are

$$y(t) = y_i + v_{yi} t + \frac{1}{2}a_y t^2 \\ v_y(t) = v_{yi} + a_y t$$
 


jtbell said:
##v_{yf}## isn't a constant, it's a variable, more specifically the dependent variable, a function of t. Written as functions, your two equations are

$$y(t) = y_i + v_{yi} t + \frac{1}{2}a_y t^2$$

$$v_y(t) = v_{yi} + a_y t$$

Thank you!
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top