Is there a convenient parameterization for muon radiative losses in matter?

  • Thread starter Thread starter stakhanov
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matter Muon
stakhanov
Messages
12
Reaction score
1
The muon energy loss equation (at high energies) is:

-dE/dx = a(E) + b(E)E

where a(E) represents the ionization losses (Bethe equation), and b(E) represents radiative losses (bremsstrahlung, pair production, photo-nuclear).

From what I have read, at high energies for high-Z materials, radiative losses dominate ionization losses (beyond the muon critical energy). I am ok with the ionization part but is there a simple way to represent the radiative losses (b(E)E) for a certain Z or density?

I can't seem to find anything, even though on the graphs you see of energy loss v. energy, the radiative losses seem to pretty much follow a straight line.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I take it that's a 'no' then!
 
Perhaps these are of interest

http://geant4.cern.ch/G4UsersDocuments/UsersGuides/PhysicsReferenceManual/html/node48.html

http://geant4.cern.ch/G4UsersDocuments/UsersGuides/PhysicsReferenceManual/html/node46.html

from a CERN Physics Reference Manual (from Geant4 Users' Documents)

This might also be of use:

Muon Bremsstrahlung and Muonic Pair Production in Air Showers.
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/astro-ph/pdf/0006/0006108v1.pdf
Some good references.

Or use seach Google with "muon","bremsstrahlung","cross section"
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top