Is There a Cure for Computing Phobia?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monocles
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Computing
AI Thread Summary
Computing phobia is becoming increasingly common, with individuals avoiding calculations and relying heavily on computers for tasks like derivatives and integrals. This avoidance can lead to frustration, as seen in the example of spending hours procrastinating on lab reports due to the perceived difficulty of manual calculations. While some users express a preference for traditional methods, such as paper and pen for algebraic manipulations, others find comfort in using technology for complex computations. The discussion highlights a shift from enjoyment in computing to a reliance on machines, raising questions about overcoming this phobia. Ultimately, balancing technology use with manual calculation can help maintain engagement and creativity in problem-solving.
Monocles
Messages
463
Reaction score
2
I've noticed more and more that I go to absurd lengths to avoid computing things. Everything from finding derivatives to solving integrals to simplifying expressions I've been doing on a computer for the past couple of years, and it's gotten so bad that I don't even attempt to do the calculations myself if there isn't a computer nearby. I think I've developed a computing phobia. I was writing a lab report today and spent 2 hours avoiding plugging numbers into the equations because it sounded like such dismal work to me! I especially hate ugly equations with lots of terms like hydrogen or Landau level wave functions.

I didn't used to be this way - I used to LOVE computing things when I was younger and hadn't yet reached the point where calculators were allowed in school.

Has anyone else ever contracted computing phobia and gotten over it?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I have the same problem with calculations that seem boring to me, like basic additions or
multiplications of two lenghty numbers. I usually find myself using a calculator :)

However I prefer to perform algebraic manipulations, or evaluate derivatives and integrals with paper and pen, especially those that are tricky and cannot be solved mechanically. It forces your creativity to stay active.

I personally think there is nothing too wrong using a computer for just plugging numbers into a complicated (perhaps multivariable) function.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top