Is There a Fifth Fundamental Force in Physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cubey
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the existence of a potential fifth fundamental force in physics, with participants asserting that there are only four recognized forces: the Electromagnetic Force, the Weak Nuclear Force, the Strong Nuclear Force, and Gravity. Some argue that while theories like electroweak and the GG model unify forces, they do not introduce a new fundamental force. The conversation touches on the importance of consensus within the scientific community regarding these principles. Participants emphasize that scientific statements often carry the caveat of community agreement. Overall, the consensus remains that no fifth fundamental force has been established.
cubey
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
There are only 4, the Electromagnetic Force, the Weak Nuclear Force,the Strong Nuclear Force and Gravity.
And if you yes or no please explain why.
I'm not sure if this is the proper place in this forum or even if this is the proper forum to ask this question,but I'll give it try.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That's a matter of opinion, I'd call it more semantic than dogmatic... but either one could be easily argued for.
 
I think it should be taken for granted that any general scientific principle statement always carries the caveat: 'it is the consensus of the scientific community that...'
 
russ_watters said:
I think it should be taken for granted that any general scientific principle statement always carries the caveat: 'it is the consensus of the scientific community that...'
While that is certainly true (e.g. inflation, lambda CDM, double compact binaries for shGRBs, etc), its not especially apt for this case in light of electroweak or the GG model, etc.
 
zhermes said:
While that is certainly true (e.g. inflation, lambda CDM, double compact binaries for shGRBs, etc), its not especially apt for this case in light of electroweak or the GG model, etc.
Those combine two forces into one theory,they don't add a new force.

Hey! No fair delteting a post while I am reading it!
 
cubey said:
There are only 4...

HallsofIvy said:
Those combine two forces into one theory,they don't add a new force.

Yes. That is true. (Well, GG goes 3 -> 1).
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top