Is There a Gauss' Law for Gravitation?

AI Thread Summary
There is a Gauss's law for gravitation, expressed as Φ = 4πG * Menclosed, which parallels the electric version. For magnetic fields, Gauss's law exists as part of Maxwell's Equations, stating that the net magnetic flux through a closed surface is zero, indicating the absence of magnetic monopoles. Magnetic field lines can intersect only at points where the field strength is zero, leading to questions about the existence of magnetic monopoles. Current theories, including those referenced in introductory physics textbooks, suggest that magnetic monopoles might exist, but none have been discovered. The inclusion of magnetic charge in Maxwell's equations introduces symmetry but creates inconsistencies with magnetic potential.
aniketp
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
hello,
I was wondering if there is an equivalent gauss' law for gravitation like:
\Phi=4\piG*Menclosed
any help would be appreciated. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Absolutely. See: "[URL law for gravity[/URL]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thank you. but do magnetic fields have any such law? intuitively, i am inclined to say no,
because magnetic field lines can cross...but i would like a rigorous proof
 
aniketp said:
but do magnetic fields have any such law? intuitively, i am inclined to say no,
because magnetic field lines can cross...but i would like a rigorous proof
Yes, there's a Gauss's law for magnetic fields--it's one of Maxwell's Equations. Since there are no magnetic monopoles, it is rather simple: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gauss%27_law_for_magnetism" .

Magnetic field lines can cross only where the field is zero.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm curious as to why there isn't any magnetic monopoles. The freshman physics textbook I read for my intro physics course says that current theory (I think it was Serway) does predict the existence of magnetic monopoles.
 
No one seems to have found any magnetic monopoles. By including magnetic charge and magnetic current terms in Maxwell's equations you postulate magnetic charge. It brings some (anti-) symmetry to the equations, but this is inconsistence with the magnetic potential.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top