Is there a magnetic field around a moving single charge?

AI Thread Summary
A moving single charge, such as a proton, does indeed produce a magnetic field, as all moving charged particles generate magnetic fields. The discussion highlights that the nature of the charge carriers, whether protons or other positively charged particles, does not affect the creation of the magnetic field. It emphasizes the relationship between electric and magnetic fields as described by Maxwell's equations, particularly under Lorentz transformations. The conversation also touches on the importance of charge conservation in understanding current and magnetic fields. Overall, the interaction of electric and magnetic fields is seen as a unified phenomenon influenced by the observer's frame of reference.
lenfromkits
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
is there a magnetic field around a moving "single" charge?

Quote: "All moving charged particles produce magnetic fields."

Hypothetically - if you took a bunch of charged hydrogen ions (H+) and moved them through space, would there be a magnetic field around them? (ie, there are no electrons anywhere in this experiment, only protons)

From what I understand, a magnetic field only occurs when you have electrons amidst the positively charge protons such that - relatively speaking - in the case of a current, the electrons are moving one direction while the protons move the other.

Is there anywhere I can find information about this specific test?

Thanks!
:)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Yes, there would be a magnetic field around an isolated moving charge.
 


Consider that current - an element of Maxwell's equations for electromagnetism - is measured as charge-per-unit-time, moving across an arbitrary boundary.

The nature of the current-bearing elements don't matter. Protons are fine, or alpha particles (helium nuclei +2) they make a dandy magnetic current as they dash off.
 


It certainly makes a magnetic field. An easy way to prove this is that under a Lorentz transformation, a pure electric field becomes a mixture of electric and magnetic fields.

What you have to watch out for is the assumption that this is "the" field of an infinitesimal element of current. Maxwell's equations imply charge conservation, but an isolated infinitesimal element of current violates charge conservation.
 


bcrowell said:
It certainly makes a magnetic field. An easy way to prove this is that under a Lorentz transformation, a pure electric field becomes a mixture of electric and magnetic fields.

What you have to watch out for is the assumption that this is "the" field of an infinitesimal element of current. Maxwell's equations imply charge conservation, but an isolated infinitesimal element of current violates charge conservation.

Oooh! Whenever someone thinks like me, it's a clear sign of brilliance, I figure.

There aren't many examples of discussing electrostatics, so I'd started a thread called Postulate: EVERY field has a "magnetic" equivalent. under General Relativity,
and you'll see my cleverness is only rivaled by my humility. And modesty.

Anyhow, I agree thoroughly that electricity and magnetism are a unity with apparent differences, due principally to our frames of reference.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...

Similar threads

Back
Top