Is There a Missing Number in This Sequence?

Thread starter rootX
Start date Aug 25, 2007

AI Thread Summary

The discussion centers around a mathematical sequence and whether a number is missing. Participants clarify that there should not be a "2" in the sequence since it cancels with the "2" in the denominator of the equation provided. The equation discussed is (1/v)[(2x)/(2sqrt(l^2 + x^2))]. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding cancellation in mathematical expressions. Overall, the consensus is that the sequence is correct as presented.

Aug 25, 2007

rootX

http://aycu11.webshots.com/image/27370/2003197943184046097_rs.jpg

http://aycu11.webshots.com/image/27370/2003197943184046097_rs.jpg

Physics news on Phys.org

Aug 25, 2007

proton

no, there shouldn't be a 2 because it cancels with the 2 in the denominator:

(1/v)[(2x)/(2sqrt(l^2 + x^2))]

Aug 25, 2007

rootX

proton said:

no, there shouldn't be a 2 because it cancels with the 2 in the denominator:

(1/v)[(2x)/(2sqrt(l^2 + x^2))]

oh thank you!

Aug 25, 2007

proton

your welcome

Thread 'I've come across another fluid pressure problem I don't understand'

Neglect gravity other than that of water; neglect friction. F1=ρgsh=1000*10*1*(1+4)=50000 N; F1=ρgsh=1000*10*0.1*4=4000 N; F3=50000-4000=46000 N?

View full post »

Thread 'Struggling to understand the concept of this question (ice cube in water optics question)'

TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

View full post »

Thread 'Rolling without slipping on a curved surface'

Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .

View full post »