Is There a Quicker Way to Find All Possible Values of h for fh(a+bx+cx2+dx3)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter says
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
94 replies · 8K views
says said:
if h = 0 then b could be any real number
Right.

What's the kernel for f0 ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
says said:
What is f0?
It's fh when h = 0 .
 
says said:
ker fh = span {(1,0,0,0), (0,1,1,0)}
Let's doublecheck:
##f_h(a,b,c,d)=(a+b+c+hd,b+c,-b-c-hd,hb)##
##f_0(a,b,c,d)=(a+b+c,b+c,-b-c,0)##

##f_0(1,0,0,0)=(1,0,0,0)\neq (0,0,0,0)##
##f_0(0,1,1,0)=(2,2,-2,0)\neq (0,0,0,0)##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SammyS
says said:
ker fh = span {(0,1,-1,0)}

when h=0
There is another vector (independent of this) in the kernel of f0 .
 
but there is only one independent variable though. I thought that would mean only one vector? Unless the other vector is just (0,-1,1,0)
 
says said:
but there is only one independent variable though. I thought that would mean only one vector? Unless the other vector is just (0,-1,1,0)
How about you go back to the matrix equation you had in post #41, substitute h=0, and solve?
 
says said:
ker(fh) = span {(0,-1,1,0) , (0,1,-1,0) , (1,1,1,0)}
One of those is redundant, another is wrong. Please post your working.
 
1+1+1+h=0
0-1-1-h=0
0+1+1+0=0
0+h+0+0=0

making h=0

1+1+1+0=0
0-1-1-0=0
0+1+1+0=0
0+0+0+0=0

if b=1 c=-1 then the first equation a =0

ker(fh)= span {(0,1,-1,0) , (0,-1,1,0)}
 
says said:
1+1+1+h=0
0-1-1-h=0
0+1+1+0=0
0+h+0+0=0

making h=0

1+1+1+0=0
0-1-1-0=0
0+1+1+0=0
0+0+0+0=0

if b=1 c=-1 then the first equation a =0

ker(fh)= span {(0,1,-1,0) , (0,-1,1,0)}
(0,1,-1,0) and (0,-1,1,0) are redundant.

What does your matrix tell you about d ?
 
d=0

I don't understand how they are redundant if they are two different vectors?
 
says said:
I don't understand how they are redundant if they are two different vectors?
They are redundant because they are not linearly independent:
##(0,1,-1,0)=-1*(0,-1,1,0)##
 
says said:
d=0

I don't understand how they are redundant if they are two different vectors?
One is simply -1 times the other. I.e. their sum is zero.

Also, why does d need to be 0? isn't 0d = 0 no matter what the value of d ?
 
Ok, I understand that, but how can the first equation (1,1,1,0) be in ker(fh) 1+1+1+0=0 as well?
 
Actually
says said:
Ok, I understand that, but how can the first equation (1,1,1,0) be in ker(fh) 1+1+1+0=0 as well?
It's not, and Samy_A demonstrated that.
 
SammyS said:
There is another vector (independent of this) in the kernel of f0 .

What's the other vector in ker(fh) if that's not it though? There's only 3 equations there and your saying one is redundant, one is in the kernel, and the other isn't in there...
 
Actually, once you decide to look at h=0, then the original statement of the problem can be used to find Ker f0 by inspection.

##\displaystyle \ f_h(a + bx + cx^2 + dx^3) = \pmatrix{a+b+c+hd&b+c\\-b-c-hd & hb} \ ##

so that

##\displaystyle \ f_0(a + bx + cx^2 + dx^3) = \pmatrix{a+b+c+0&b+c\\-b-c-0 & 0} \ ##
 
The only other vector I can think of is the zero vector. (0,0,0,0)
 
says said:
The only other vector I can think of is the zero vector. (0,0,0,0)
Again I ask, What value must d have if 0⋅d = 0 ?
 
says said:
d can be any value 0*d=0

0*1=0
0*-1=0
0*0=0
Yes.

Therefore, the other vector is ____ ?
 
says said:
(1,0,0,-1)
That's not correct.

Why involve ##a## ?
 
Because the first equation was (1,1,1,h) = 1+1+1+hd. If d=-1 then can't b and c = 0, making a = 1?
 
says said:
Because the first equation was (1,1,1,h) = 1+1+1+hd. If d=-1 then can't b and c = 0, making a = 1?
For h = 0, (1,1,1,h) → (1,1,1,0) so that if a=b=c=0, then d does not need to be zero.
 
the transformation always has d as a product with h though. so even if d=1 or -1 in the polynom it will still be 0 in the matrix
 
says said:
the transformation always has d as a product with h though. so even if d=1 or -1 in the polynom it will still be 0 in the matrix
That's right.

SammyS said:
Actually, once you decide to look at h=0, then the original statement of the problem can be used to find Ker f0 by inspection.

##\displaystyle \ f_0(a + bx + cx^2 + dx^3) = \pmatrix{a+b+c+0&b+c\\-b-c-0 & 0} \ ##
There is no value of d which keeps this from being the 2×2 zero matrix.So, how to you write that as a vector?