Is There a Simple Explanation for the Area Element in Fermi Normal Coordinates?

PLuz
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

Defined the Fermi Normal Coordinates (which can be seen for example http://relativity.livingreviews.org/open?pubNo=lrr-2011-7&page=articlese10.html" ) is there any heuristic argument to explain why the area element is something proportional to the element of solid angle? I was trying to find a way to avoid the need to compute explicitly the area element in order prove for the first and third results of Eq.17.26 of that reference...

Any ideas?


Thank you
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Surely it's because the 2 (or n? doesn't seem to matter)-sphere you're integrating over is a symmetric domain, and the integrand is always odd in at least one of the coordinates, so the integral has to vanish. The second result is the non-trivial one.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Back
Top