Is There a Simple Way to Route 9 Channels with Multiple Connectors on a PCB?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around designing a PCB with multiple DF13 connectors to route 9 channels from 50 possible choices to a DV connector. The user seeks a simple solution, potentially involving logic ICs or multiplexers, to manage channel selection and ensure consistent numbering for ease of identification. Concerns arise regarding the nature of the signals (analog resistance from thermistors) and the practicality of using microcontrollers versus simpler mechanical solutions. Participants emphasize the need for more detailed specifications and a clear understanding of the selection process to provide effective recommendations. The complexity of the task suggests that a microcontroller might ultimately be the simplest solution despite the user's preference for simplicity.
_Bd_
Messages
107
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I am designing a PCB with multiple 2-pos DF13 connectors in it (Like 50+).
at the end of the board there is a 10 pos. cable.

My intent is that the user (me) connects up to 9 channels in any position I like (I have 50 possible choices). However, this board is connected to another PCB that runs on DV connector that can only read 9 channels.

I wanted to know if there is a simple way to have some sort of logic IC (or maybe some other simpler way?) so that 9 channels get routed into the output of the board. Also, if there is a way for this IC to always number them in the same way (say top left is no. 1 , and go incremental row-wise or column-wise).

That way I can know which channel is which and I won't have to be testing each one everytime i use a different combination of positions (out of the possible 50).

Im assuming it is related to how TVs work (using a giant matrix of pixels) but this is a very small matrix of sensors that might or might not be in use.

Thank you!
 

Attachments

  • detect.png
    detect.png
    3.3 KB · Views: 444
Engineering news on Phys.org
How does the circuit know which channels are used? Do you program it? Do you have to change that frequently?

50-->9 can be done with 9 multiplexers, and if you can program them you can get every possible routing.
 
What are the channels conducting, and what is permissible in the switching array? Are you switching Logic, analog voltage? analog Current? As you scan the inputs, how might you tell whether something is connected? Can you program a micro controller to scan the array and make decisions? Does it need to remember the settings through a power down? Are you switching 1000 volts? 200MHz? How fast do you need to decide? ETC ETC ETC

What are you really trying to do?

There is much you have left out that makes it impossible to answer.
 
Each channel has a thermistor in it, so it only reads resistance. So analgo voltage I would assume.

Yes i could add a micro-controller to scan and make decisions, however I would like to keep it as simple as possible. I am looking for the simplest solution.
 
again you fail to adequately describe what you are actually trying to do. Nothing about the selection process, how you want it to work. Try drawing a diagram with switches that show selected and unselected channels and where the control information comes from.

It may be that a uC IS the simplest, but it's hard to be sure with no real specification.
 
There are commercial mechanical switches with relays. I guess electronic multiplexers don't help if you want to measure resistances on those channels.
Where is the "logical"?
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top