Is there a simpler explanation for the equation \omega=\frac{2\pi}{T}=2\pi f?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the equivalence of angular velocity (\omega) with the formulas \(\omega = \frac{2\pi}{T} = 2\pi f\), emphasizing their validity in circular motion. Participants highlight that angular velocity relates to time and frequency, where frequency (in hertz) represents revolutions per second. The conversation also touches on the broader application of frequency beyond circular motion, suggesting it can describe repetitive events in various contexts. Ultimately, the participants reach a mutual understanding of the concepts involved. The explanation of these relationships enhances comprehension of angular motion and frequency.
DB
Messages
501
Reaction score
0
I saw this on Wikipedia
\omega=\frac{2\pi}{T}=2\pi f = v/r

What I don't understand is \omega= \\ \frac{2\pi}{T}=2\pi f
How can they be equivilant?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
THINK OF THE CIRCULAR MOVEMENT WITH CONSTANT ANGULAR VELOCITY...It will enlighten you.And a bit of trigonometry +geometry woudln't hurt at all...

Daniel.
 
Let me clarify my question:
How can angular velocity be equivilant to 2pi divided by time in seconds and also equivilant to 2pi x hertz (in seconds obviously)? Isn't frequency dealing with circular motion revolutions per second?
 
Last edited:
Of course it is.That's what i suggested.
T=\frac{1}{\nu}

T=\frac{2\pi}{\omega}

\omega =2 \pi \nu

All of them are valid for circular motion...And completely equivalent...

WHAT IS ANGULAR VELOCITY...?

Daniel.
 
ya, ya. I wasn't doubting they weren't equivilant. I just didnt understand why. I see it now though. Thanks man.
 
Notice though that the so called "circular motion" which frequency must deal with would rather to be thought of metaphoricly. Circular as in a repeation of a certain entity and motion in the sense of things altering as the function of another variable. We may very well measure the frequency of people taking their dogs out on a walk or the frequency of wagons appearing on a merry go round wheel as the function of the distance along it's rim.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top