Is there a specific length of time for cold process saponification?

AI Thread Summary
Curing time for cold process soap varies, with four to six weeks for solid oils and six months or more for 100% Castille soap. The amount of water used in the soap mixture affects the time needed for saponification, with less water allowing for quicker tracing. More water can slow down saponification and increase the risk of breaking the emulsion, particularly with soft oils. Adding clay or mineral thickeners can stabilize the trace and improve the emulsification process. Using a 1:1 lye-to-water ratio has proven effective for some, simplifying the soap-making process.
Vintageliving
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
There are often posts on the soapmaking forums about using one's own soap before it is cured. Curing time for soaps made with oils that solidify at room temperature is four to six weeks. For 100% Castille (olive oil) or similar, the curing time is six months or longer.

Of course, we all test our own soaps after a few days.

Does the amount of water used increase or decrease the length of time needed for saponification?

It is standard practice to use less water for soft oils, one part lye and one part water, so that the soap will come to trace more quickly. (Trace is when the soap is the consistency of soft custard, identified by the traces left on the soap when one drizzles it onto the top of the mixture in the pot.) Soap must reach trace in order to put it into the mold. When using more water, for ex.: 1 lye to 1 1/2 water, it can take ten hours for Castille soap to come to trace when hand stirring. (Many use immersion blenders, which is faster.)

Could someone spell this out for me? There are many questions about it on the soap forums.

Thank you very much!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
It is likely that the more fluid the early trace, the more tendency it has to break the emulsion. This would correlate with the amount of water added. I would expect this to be more of a problem with soft oils (higher percentage of unsaturate) as well since their more open structure would let the water phase migrate more easily. Adding in a little soap from a previous batch to the new batch should help in the early emulsification step and might stabilize the trace. You might even try a bit of a more purely saturated soap such as coconut or palm. Mineral thickeners (clay) should help as well.

More water also thins out the lye concentration and reduces the rate of saponification. And it is that rate of saponification that is the primary parameter that determines the trace point.
 
Chemisttree, thanks very much for your explanation. Some do pour into molds at very early trace. I have done it once, and that is the Castille-castor that developed so much ash and went rancid. (That is also the batch I left uncovered.)

I may try a few bits of soap from the same recipe in a batch.

I don't use coconut as I find coconut soaps irritating, but I will pass on the suggestion.

Do you mean palm or palm kernel?

How would clay speed saponification?

I hope you don't mind so many questions. I really appreciate your help.
 
Last edited:
Vintageliving said:
How would clay speed saponification?

Clay and other mineral thickeners help to stabilize the trace... keep it from oiling out. This helps maintain a finely-divided emulsion and that is what you want. Remember that the reaction is occurring at the interface of the oil and water phase. A more finely-divided emulsion has the maximum surface area between these two phases. It is why the stick blenders help in achieving early trace. That homogenation/emulsification step increases the interfacial area between the phases which is what you want.
 
Chemisttree, thank you! It'll be interesting to use the clay and see what it does.
 
Chemisttree, I ended up using a ratio of 1:1 for lye:water, and soaping at room temperature, which has made the whole process simple and easy. It works splendidly for the Castile and olive-castor soaps. I never did join the stick-blender folks, and still stir with a slotted, stainless steel spoon.

Thank you very much for taking the time to post so much help. Your explanations and suggestions have been most useful. I appreciate it.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top