Is There a Topological or Geometrical Approach to the Riemann Hypothesis?

  • Thread starter Thread starter narniaoff
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conjecture Riemann
narniaoff
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello dear forum members I wanted to know where are the research on the Riemann hypothesis , the latest advances ,who are the currently leading experts and is now known that mathematics it requires for its resolution
 
Physics news on Phys.org
narniaoff said:
Hello dear forum members I wanted to know where are the research on the Riemann hypothesis , the latest advances ,who are the currently leading experts and is now known that mathematics it requires for its resolution

We don't appear to have enough mathematics developed for its resolution, no. The cutting edge research has been to show that a positive fraction (2/5?) of zeros must lie on the critical line and that almost all zeros are within epsilon of the critical line. There are also known zero-free regions near the boundary of the critical strip.

Many problems have been shown equivalent to the RH, notable (to me, at least) Robin's theorem. So far it seems like these other problems, though often elementary, are no easier to solve than the original. The 'direct approach' through analytic number theory seems the most likely resolution at the moment, though I doubt the solution will be found soon. (I'd love to be wrong there.)
 
thanks for your clear answers but i want to know is there a topological approach or geometrical approach of this problem
 
narniaoff said:
thanks for your clear answers but i want to know is there a topological approach or geometrical approach of this problem

None that I'm aware of, no.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top