Is there a way to break down the Culomb?

  • Thread starter Thread starter swraman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Break
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the breakdown of the Coulomb in relation to mass, length, and time, noting that while many mechanical units can be expressed in these terms, the Coulomb cannot. The definition of the Ampere, which describes the force between two conductors, establishes that the Coulomb is defined as one Ampere for one second. Although the Ampere is an independent SI base unit, other unit systems like cgs can express charge in terms of mass, length, and time, but this is due to their definitions rather than physical relationships. The Coulomb is considered a fundamental unit in electrical phenomena, requiring a fourth base quantity for proper definition. Establishing a measurement reference based on the Coulomb remains challenging, but the current definitions provide a precise framework for understanding electrical units.
swraman
Messages
165
Reaction score
0
The thread on mass and force made me think...
Most units in mechanics can be broken down into a combination of length, mass, and time.
eg. power = mass * distance * time^-2 * distance * time^-1 (force*velocity)

Is there any way to break the culomb down into mass, length, and time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes from the definition of the Ampere
"One ampere is defined to be the constant current which will produce an attractive force of 2×10^–7 Newton per metre of length between two straight, parallel conductors of infinite length and negligible circular cross section placed one metre apart in a vacuum"
And a coulomb is 1 Amp for 1 second.
 
Last edited:
However, the ampere is its own SI base unit, independent of the kilogram, metre, and second. In the SI system, the coulomb cannot be written in terms of these three base units.

However, in other unit systems, such as cgs (of which there is more than one type), units of charge are defined in terms of the other base units (centimetre, gram, second), but that is only due to the way they are defined, rather than anything physical.
 
The Coulomb cannot be resolved into mass, length, and/or time quantities. Electrical phenomena require the addition of a 4th base quantity to define them. The base electrical unit is the Coulomb, and all other electric/magnetic quantities are defined from the coulomb.

But, it is difficult to establish a measurement reference based on the Coulomb at this present time. If we define the amp as the current which results in a specific force between 2 conductors, it is precise and repeatable. So we define the amp per the above post, and the Coulomb is 1 amp * 1 sec. The Coulomb is actually more basic than the Amp, but it is easier to establish the Amp as the reference. I hope this helps. BR.

Claude
 
thanks
 
A coulomb is then equal to exactly 6.241 509 629 152 65×1018 elementary charges. Combined with the present definition of the ampere, this proposed definition would make the kilogram a derived unit.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coulomb
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top